“Barack Obama, who informs campaign audiences that he taught constitutional law for 10 years, might be expected to weigh in on the historic Second Amendment case before the U.S. Supreme Court. The justices are pondering whether the 1976 District of Columbia law effectively prohibiting personal gun ownership in the nation’s capital is constitutional. But Sen. Obama has not stated his position. Obama, disagreeing with the D. C. government and gun control advocates, declares the Second Amendment’s ‘right of the people to keep and bear arms’ applies to individuals, not just the ‘well-regulated militia’ cited in the amendment. In the next breath, he asserts this constitutional guarantee does not preclude local ‘common sense’ restrictions on firearms. Does the Draconian prohibition for Washington, D. C., fit that description? My attempts to get an answer have proved unavailing. The front-running Democratic presidential candidate is doing the gun dance.” —Robert Novak
SOURCE: Patriot Post
Conservative Libertarian Outpost 
April 7, 2008 at 09:15
Obama, if my memory serves me well, was in Hawaii in 1999 when there
was a gun control measure before the Illinois Senate. He was asked to
return early because his vote was critical and he was criticized for not
doing so.
Obama’s voting record in general has been criticized. Would anyone with
knowledge in this area please followup.
LikeLike