Montana passed liberty and freedom from the Authoritarians in the federal government. I love it!
House shoots down federal gun controls
Posted on Feb. 14
HELENA (AP) – Montana lawmakers fired another shot in battles for states’ rights as they supported letting some Montana gun owners and dealers skip reporting their transactions to the federal government.
Under House Bill 246, firearms made in Montana and used in Montana would be exempt from federal regulation. The same would be true for firearm accessories and ammunition made and sold in the state.
“What we need here is for Montana to be able to handle Montana’s business and affairs,” Republican Rep. Joel Boniek told fellow lawmakers Saturday. The wilderness guide from Livingston defeated Republican incumbent Bruce Malcolm in last spring’s election.
|
// –> |
Boniek’s measure aims to circumvent federal authority over interstate commerce, which is the legal basis for most gun regulation in the United States. The bill potentially could release Montanans from both federal gun registration requirements and dealership licensing rules. Since the state has no background-check laws on its own books, the legislation also could free gun purchasers from that requirement.
“Firearms are inextricably linked to the history and culture of Montana, and I’d like to support that,” Boniek said. “But I want to point out that the issue here is not about firearms. It’s about state rights.”
The House voted 64-36 for the bill on Saturday. If it clears a final vote, the measure will go to the Senate.
House Republicans were joined by 14 Democrats in passing the measure.
“I would hope that our U.S. Supreme Court would begin to retreat from what I think is an abusive interpretation of our interstate commerce clause,” said Rep. Deborah Kottel, a Democrat from Great Falls who supports the measure.
That clause in the U.S. Constitution grants Congress authority to regulate commerce with foreign nations, and among the states. The Supreme Court has handled cases seeking to limit the clause’s application in recent years. In 2005, the court upheld federal authority to regulate marijuana under the clause, even when its use is limited to noncommercial purposes n such as medical reasons n and it is grown and used within a state’s borders.
The Montana bill follows fears here and elsewhere that the election of Barack Obama as president will trigger more gun regulation. In the months before Obama’s inauguration, Montanans rushed to stock up on guns, pushing gun sales beyond normal benchmarks despite the recession.
Opponents of the measure worry lax regulations in the state could lead to a similar surge in both gun sales and gun manufacturing.
“Who are we bringing in and is this the kind of business we want to have in this state?” asked Rep. Sue Malek, D-Missoula. “I want our state to be recognized as a state that cares about people, and that cares about the environment.”
The bill is one of a number the Legislature is considering that may extend gun rights in Montana.
Earlier in the week, the House passed another measure, HB228, that would let Montanans carry concealed weapons in city limits without having permits.
On Saturday the House Judiciary Committee narrowly passed a resolution that affirms Montanans’ right to carry weapons in national parks and wildlife refuges.
Tags: Constitution, Law, News, Politics, Second Amendment, states rights
February 17, 2009 at 15:53
I wonder if MontanaFred would be a good thing?? 🙂
LikeLike
February 17, 2009 at 16:47
[…] […]
LikeLike
February 17, 2009 at 17:04
[…] […]
LikeLike
February 17, 2009 at 17:12
Congratulations! Hurray for the House! Great comment, too, Fred. FYI: there’s an editorial in today’s LA Times, page A16, about concealed-carry permits. latimes.com then ‘opinion.’
LikeLike
February 17, 2009 at 17:34
[…] from the Heartland: Other Blogs Jump to Comments Montana Pisses in Obama’s Corn Flakes – Patrick Sperry/Conservative Libertarian […]
LikeLike
February 18, 2009 at 08:30
All states need to adopt this attitude – except maybe NY, California & Illinois – they never would. This is what our republic is all about! Secession would be a good next step too!
LikeLike
February 18, 2009 at 09:37
Pops, in I general tend to agree with you. About Illinois I really can’t say. I know that there are a lot of very good people in the state that have been in a fight for liberty that has been going on for generations…
I also know that New York, the state, is almost 180 degrees on social positions from that of New York, the city. The folks outside NYC can’t get anything passed because of the overwhelming majority in population that the city holds. Secession certainly would seem to be in order there! That, is a perfect display of mob rule being democracy that I have posted about so many times.
California, my birth state, is socially psychotic. Back, way back when, there was a movement to split the state. That would still make sense because once you get north of Orange County it becomes a whole new, and very different world. With the Central Valley being a noted exception! Will it (A split into north and south) ever happen? No, it never will, because of mob rule.
Thanks for stopping by.
LikeLike
February 25, 2009 at 22:19
[…] Montana pisses in Obama’s cornflakes! « Conservative Libertaria.. […]
LikeLike
June 18, 2009 at 17:35
Democracy is 2 wolves and a lamb voting on what’s for dinner. Liberthy is a well armed lamb contesting the vote. LOL
LikeLike
June 19, 2009 at 04:29
So true Lew! Thanks for stopping by.
LikeLike