An ominous political precedent…

Army Preps for Tea Party ‘Terrorists’

“The duty imposed upon [the president] to take care, that the laws be faithfully executed, follows out the strong injunctions of his oath of office, that he will ‘preserve, protect, and defend the constitution.’ The great object of the executive department is to accomplish this purpose; and without it, be the form of government whatever it may, it will be utterly worthless for offence, or defence; for the redress of grievances, or the protection of rights; for the happiness, or good order, or safety of the people.” –Justice Joseph Story

A few months back, the commander in chief or our Armed Forces, that erstwhile community organizer Barack Hussein Obama, denigrated a large cross section of Americans who identify with the Tea Party movement — those who advocate for Essential Liberty and Rule of Law.

Obama identified them as malcontents, “waving their little tea bags.”

Since then, the Obama administration and their Leftmedia sycophants have endeavored to characterize Tea Party attendees as rude, radical, racist, redneck, enemies of the state.

In fact, Americans who attend Tea Party rallies are from all walks of life, as noted in the Patriot Declaration, Patriots who are peacefully and constitutionally petitioning their government for redress.

As I noted in my tax-day essay, Tea Parties are “not a call for revolution but for restoration — a call to undertake whatever measures are dictated by prudence and necessity to restore constitutional Rule of Law.”

However, Obama’s words do have consequences.

This week, I was contacted by a number of military personnel, enlisted and officer ranks, who expressed concern about a military exercise underway at Ft. Knox, the U.S. Bullion Depository. As with most such exercises, the Ft. Knox alert occurred in stages, as if real time intelligence was being provided at various intervals.

The first intel advisory was issued on Friday, 23 April 2010, and identifies the terrorist threat adversaries as “Local Militia Groups / Anti-Government Protesters / TEA Party.”

You read that right: “TEA Party”!

The alert states that plans for the demonstration may have been interrupted by “Federal and local law enforcement” raids on a “White Supremacists Organization,” but “TEA Party organizers have stated that they will protest at the Gold Vault at a future date.”

Further, the intel advisory states, “Anti-Government – Health Care Protesters have stated that they would join the TEA Party as a sign of solidarity.”

In accordance with the exercise, Ft. Knox post security is placed on high alert because, “these groups are armed, have combative training and some are former Military Snipers. Some may have explosives training / experience,” and “a rally at their compound / training area is scheduled.”

Another intel update was issued on Monday, 26 April 2010, noting that the “rally at the Militia compound occurred,” and “Viable threats … have been made.” The intel on the rally notes, “Many members were extremely agitated at what they referred to as Government intervention and over taxation in their lives. Alcohol use ‘fanned the flames.’ Many military grade firearms were openly carried. An ad hoc ‘shoot the government agent’ event was held with prizes (alcohol) given for the best shot placement.”

The report states further, “Components of bomb making are reported to have been on the site. Some members have criminal records relating to explosive and weapons violations.”

In response to the “immediate threat,” the exercise stipulates, “local detention centers are being made ready for mass arrests.” Both the “QRF I and QRF II” are placed on two hour recall, and the “5-15 CAV” was ordered to “draw weapons from holder and store in most available arms room,” and “coordinate with MASA for immediate ammunition draw; have equipment readied for immediate use, i.e. vehicles staged and loaded IAW 5-15 CAV SOP; LMR’s charged.”

QRF refers to Quick Reaction Force. QRF I is the 16th Cavalry Regiment. QRF II is the 194th Armored Brigade.

The 26 April order gives specific instructions for the 5-15 CAV (a 16th Cavalry battalion) to have weapons, ammo, vehicles and communications at ready, and it places the other 2,200 members of the units on two-hour recall. In other words, these orders are to gear up for defending Ft. Knox against Tea Party folks and their co-conspirators who oppose nationalization of our health care sector.

Now, for almost 30 years I have participated in the development and implementation of small and large scale military exercises within the U.S. and around the world.

Such exercises are critical to the readiness of our forces, and the standard for the real time intel reports in these drills requires thinly veiled references to assets of existing or collateral threat vectors such as communist regimes such as China and real terrorist networks such as al-Qa’ida, etc.

Perhaps the writers of such exercises today should focus on response plans for, say, an Islamic terrorist who attacks a post. (See Ft. Hood / Major Nidal Malik Hasan.)

The Ft. Knox exercise is not only amateurish in its construct, but also sets an ominous political precedent.

The military officers and enlisted personnel with whom I spoke are all dedicated uniformed Patriots who are loyal, first and foremost, to their oath to “support and defend” our Constitution “against all enemies, foreign and domestic.”

Their concerns about this exercise mirrored my own. As one put it, the exercise “misrepresents freedom loving Americans as drunken, violent racists — the opponents of Obama’s policies have been made the enemy of the U.S. Army.”

They were equally concerned that command staff at Ft. Knox had signed off on this exercise, noting, “it has been issued and owned by field grade officers who lead our battalions and brigades,” which is to say many Lieutenant Colonels saw this order before it was implemented.

It’s not likely that Ft. Knox Commanding General James Milano or Deputy Commander Col. David Teeples, or even the regimental and brigade commanders for the 16th Cav and 194th AB, actually read the exercise scenario, but that doesn’t absolve responsibility for such an egregious example of political exploitation of U.S. forces.

One officer insisted, “The American people should require greater accountability of their commissioned officers, that they abide by their oath and never allow politically motivated propaganda like this exercise on any post or base again.”

Another observed, “Whether this is complacency by officers who do not see such orders as a problem, or worse, officers who recognize the problem but do not insist the orders are changed, this is a serious problem. We are discussing the training of American citizen soldiers in the use of potentially deadly force against a specific group of political dissenters. There is never a time in an officer’s career in which he does not have a duty to apply critical thought to the orders he is given and asked to give. It is my opinion that any officer that has allowed these orders to persist, to reach the level of junior officers and soldiers, has demonstrated a lack of judgment or apathy towards what his duty requires of him. Either way, we should demand more of the commissioned officers, who we as a nation empower to lead our sons and daughters into battle.”

Indeed, and at best, the blatant malfeasance on the part of the individuals who composed this exercise reflects poorly on the uniformed services.

The antidote to this patent misrepresentation of peaceable Patriots is to expose it with the Light of Truth. As our motto Veritas vos Liberabit affirms, the Truth shall set you Free!

(Note: To report examples of politically motivated “exercises” in either the civilian or military sectors of our federal government, please contact us — NewsTip@PatriotPost.US)

Semper Vigilo, Fortis, Paratus et Fidelis!

Mark Alexander
Publisher, PatriotPost.US

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

5 Responses to “An ominous political precedent…”

  1. Patrick Sperry Says:

    Directly related, from the Denver Post;

    Rosen: The Tea Partiers vs. “progressive” leftists and statists

    By Mike Rosen
    Posted: 02/18/2010 01:00:00 AM MST

    Over the years, I’ve observed Washington Post columnist E.J. Dionne move from respectably liberal to left-liberal to delusional-left. His journey might be explained, in part, by the procession of presidents and congresses.

    In the 1990s, he was mostly approving of the policies of Bill Clinton that tugged him gently to the left. When Republicans took control of Congress in 1995, his frustration began to rise. After the election of George W. Bush in 2000, Dionne was soon afflicted with Bush Derangement Syndrome. He became increasingly angry and irrational. Although he survived the disorder, he was permanently scarred.

    His attitude and mental health seemed to temporarily improve with the election of Barack Obama and the expansion of Democratic control of Congress.

    Then came the relapse. As Obama’s popularity declined and his leftist agenda stalled, Dionne has become positively apoplectic. Bush Derangement Syndrome has metastasized into Tea Party Derangement Syndrome, which has become epidemic among lefties.

    The symptoms were glaring in a recent column in which he explained that he and fellow progressives don’t regard Obama as especially liberal and can’t understand why he’s incurred the wrath of Tea Partiers. Dionne claims that Obama’s stimulus plan was “if anything, too small” and that Obamacare stops far short of the leftist dream of single-payer (socialized) medicine.

    If Obama’s march toward an American version of Euro-socialism is behind schedule, it’s not because of any lack of effort or commitment on his part. Fortunately, he was elected president, not king. He can only sign or veto legislation, he can’t impose it. Opposition from Republicans and the odd Democrat doesn’t make Obama any less liberal.

    Dionne, refusing to recognize that the left has overreached, doesn’t present it this way. This was supposed to be their moment. Frustrated by the delay, he rationalizes that Obama is too “middle-of the-road.” This theme has been echoed by others on the left like Jon Meachem, the editor of Newsweek, who proclaimed in a 2009 story that “We Are All Socialists Now.” Recently, Meachem went so far as to describe Obama — arguably the most left-wing president in our history — as “right of center.” One has to be pretty far left to place Obama on the right.

    Conveniently re-creating Obama as a non-ideological centrist, Dionne asserts that the real reason Tea Partiers oppose him is because they’re racists and anti-statists. When it was radical leftists staging rallies against Bush and comparing him to Hitler, Dionne and his ilk told us “dissent is the highest form of patriotism” (falsely attributing a quote from Marxist historian Howard Zinn to Thomas Jefferson). Dissent from the right, however, cannot be principled, so it must be seditious and mean- spirited. There’s no need to dignify Dionne’s charges of racism with a response. But Dionne reveals his true nature when he advocates “statism.”

    Statism vests supremacy and economic control in a powerful central government. Whether it be state socialism or its cousin, state capitalism, statism is intrinsically collectivist, subjugating individual freedom to a presumptuous elitist notion of the common welfare.

    Dionne dismisses anti-statism by narrowly associating it with 18th century anti-federalists who opposed the Constitution. In fact, most of our founders mistrusted a powerful central government, which is why the Constitution enumerated and restricted federal powers, safeguarded the independence of states, and reserved ultimate power to the people. “Progressive” leftists like Dionne are inherent statists with unbounded faith in the virtue and wisdom of elite bureaucrats who share their ideology to run our government, our economy and our lives.

    This is the great divide between left and right in our country and the real root of opposition from Tea Partiers and, as the polls reveal, from most Americans to Obama, Pelosi, Reid and their statist agenda.

    Mike Rosen’s radio show airs weekdays from 9 a.m. to noon on 850-KOA.



  2. Alfie Says:

    Patrick I like the article you shared in comment form. i am less impressed with Mr Alexanders take. Although I don’t like the “play” scenario it isn’t the craziest one to make up for the location. Actually a truly crazy one would be Jihadists trying to steal the gold. Seriously the location is one that is more likely to attract extremists with assumed right wing agendas therefore some security response scenario is sound.


  3. Patrick Sperry Says:

    I thought that the whole thing was interesting myself.


  4. Update: Army preps for Tea Party Terrorists « Conservative Libertarian Outpost Says:

    […] Army preps for Tea Party Terrorists By Patrick Sperry An update from Mark Alexander regarding the earlier story about the U.S. Army training for action against Tea Party activist has been […]


  5. mainenowandthen Says:

    The inherent danger here is the potential violation of the Posse Comitatus Act – the atrocities at Waco serve as the prime modern example.

    Janet Reno and Bill Clinton were the perpetrators of that horrendous act – talk about war crimes!


Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: