It appears that the Federal government is worried about the various states that have decided that enough is enough. Federal oppression has been going on for decades, if not longer, and it is high time that something was done about it.
While MFFA is about firearms it is really about everything that the Federal government has been doing under the authority of a terribly warped interpretation of the Constitution, and simply ignoring the Bill of Rights.
The federal government is arguing in a gun-rights case pending in federal court in Montana that state plans to exempt in-state guns from various federal requirements themselves make the laws void, because the growing movement certainly would impact “interstate commerce.”
The government continues to argue to the court that the Commerce Clause in the U.S. Constitution should be the guiding rule for the coming decision. The argument plays down the significance of both the Second Amendment right to bear arms and the 10th Amendment provision that reserves to states all prerogatives not specifically granted the federal government in the Constitution.
Tags: 10A, Bill of Rights, Constitution, Law, News, Politics, Second Amendment, Tenth Amendment
May 22, 2010 at 05:33
[…] Onyango gets preferential treatment?; and Presidential guest Calderon critiques May 21, 2010 PanAmMFFA: Feds: States' growing gun-rights movement a threat May 21, 2010 Patrick SperrySestak (D) v. Toomey (R) Set for November's PCW Extreme Election […]
LikeLike