Outrage at Fort Hood!

Fort Hood soldiers told to list private weapons

Base requires make, model, serial number and who owns them


WND Exclusive


WEAPONS OF CHOICE

Fort Hood soldiers told to list private weapons

Base requires make, model, serial number and who owns them


Posted: September 30, 2010
12:55 am Eastern

By Bob Unruh
© 2010 WorldNetDaily

Greg Tropino Jr. displays a popular semiautomatic pistol manufactured by Springfield Armory at G. A. T. Guns in Dundee, Illinois on June 28, 2010. The Supreme Court held Monday that Americans have the right to own a gun for self-defense anywhere they live, striking down Chicago's nearly 30-year-old handgun ban but leaving the door open for other gun-control legislation.   UPI/Brian Kersey Photo via Newscom

The U.S. Army command at Fort Hood, where Muslim psychiatrist Nidal Malik Hasan allegedly shot and killed 13 people and an unborn child, now is demanding that its soldiers confess whether they have any guns in their off-base homes, what kind of guns they are and what are their serial numbers.

The action recalls similar disclosure demands on which WND has previously reported at Fort Bliss in Texas and Fort Campbell in Kentucky.

According to Christopher Haug Sr., the chief of media relations for Fort Hood, officials at the base issued an “operation order” that directed commanders “to reinforce Soldier Health and Wellness on Sept. 27.”

Full Story

Tags: , , , , ,

3 Responses to “Outrage at Fort Hood!”

  1. mainenowandthen Says:

    To me, it would be pretty questionable as to how and why the military can enforce that rule. They sure don’t have search and seizure authorization in the civilian community.

    Like

  2. TexasFred Says:

    Is that an XD-m in .45 I see??

    Like

  3. Patrick Sperry Says:

    Actually Maine, I think that was something that was snuck into the Patriot Act. Not sure about that though.

    Sure looks like one to me Fred.

    Like

Comments are closed.


%d bloggers like this: