It’s back: Court to hear arguments over Ariz. immigration law

When the Federale’s refuse to enforce their own laws a state needs to do what it has to in order to protect itself, and it’s lawful citizen’s.

PHOENIX – The impassioned debate over the nation’s immigration policy takes center stage at the Supreme Court Wednesday in a dispute over an Arizona law that punishes employers who knowingly hire workers illegally in the U.S.

Arizona’s employer sanctions law has been used just three times in three years, but business interests and civil rights groups, backed by the Obama administration, have banded together to argue that only the federal government may enforce immigration laws.

The outcome in this case also could signal how the court would handle the controversial and more expansive Arizona immigration enforcement law, known as SB1070, that the administration challenged and a federal judge blocked key components this summer.

“It could take this less visible case and do something that impacts substantially on the SB1070 litigation by making some broader observations,” said Peter Spiro, who teaches immigration law at Temple University’s law school.

Full Story

Tags: , , , , , ,

3 Responses to “It’s back: Court to hear arguments over Ariz. immigration law”

  1. TexasFred Says:

    I have one question for everyone; When and WHERE do We, The People, draw a line in the sand and take a stand for freedom?


  2. PanAm Says:

    It’s clear from the Constitution that of course we have a federal system of government, where states have their own rights and are not subjugated in every way to the national government. But as has been mentioned by more than just a few, currently there still are numbers of people who would like to make “D.C.” superior in every way… The message from the past November election apparently has not yet been received.


  3. Patrick Sperry Says:

    So very true PanAm.


Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: