Conservative Libertarian Outpost

“Republicans are already staking their election chances less on their achievements than on the damage Democrats might do if they take over, so perhaps the GOP answer will be to do nothing and say a prayer. But Republicans could still help their prospects, and motivate their own supporters, if they use the next month to advance sound policies that highlight differences between the two parties… House leaders tell us there is zero chance of [immigration reform] passing before November. Leave it to Republicans to fan national concern about the issue for a year and then say, well, never mind. On the policy merits, this may be for the best because anything that passed in the current environment would only throw more police at the border or further harass employers. But if Republicans lose the House, their demagoguery on immigration will be one reason… [T]he GOP’s legislative record in the House is actually better than the media advertise. Many good ideas have died in the graveyard of the Senate, thanks to Democratic Leader Harry Reid’s use of the filibuster and the eagerness of too many GOP Senators (Maine’s Olympia Snowe, George Voinovich of Ohio) to run away from Mr. Bush on key issues. Republicans can’t undo all that damage in a month, but they can at least give voters some better reason to re-elect them in November.” —The Wall Street Journal

I have to wonder about the politicians in this great land of ours. Why is it that they are blind to the true issues that face our nation? I am only one that shares the same concerns. I see it in letters to the editor. I see it on the news, and yes, I see it on the blogs constantly. Let’s do a partial list, and others can add to it as they see fit. This is in no particular order, as all are of equal importance;

• Get a handle on the borders. This is a security issue, not a racial one.
• Do something meaningful about illegal immigration. This is economics 101 not even touching on the security aspects.
• Restore the many rights that have been taken from citizens, period.
• End sexism in law enforcement including the defacto preference for women in domestic violence, child support, and in social services investigations.
• Stop protecting those that use the power of government to prevent the practice of religion.
• Do something to repair Social Security. I favor a split between mandatory infusion into a government program (such as presently exist) and the ability to invest in other programs.
• Require mandatory training in schools, public or private, for what might be called “life safety.” Firearms safety, driving safely, and yes, safe sex (age appropriate), also things that some parents seem just to ignorant to teach their children. Like not to leave toddlers unattended near buckets of bleach water for example.
• Pass laws that make felony pedophilia at minimum a life sentence, with the death penalty not just an option, but the standard that is prescribed for by law.

So their it is folks. Fire at will 🙂

http://www.aynrand.org/Khatami’s Harvard Visit Is a Disgrace

Sept. 7, 2006

Irvine, CA–This Sunday, on the eve of the fifth anniversary of Sept. 11, Iran’s former president, Mohammed Khatami, will speak before Harvard’s Kennedy School of Government and give a talk titled “Ethics of Tolerance in the Age of Violence.” This is outrageous.
 
Iran is the world’s leading sponsor of terrorism. Khatami’s government jailed Iranian students who spoke out against the theocratic regime, and his intelligence service murdered leaders of an Iranian opposition party. For him to lecture Americans on ethics and non-violence is as obscene as a child molester instructing his victims on the importance of respecting individual rights.
 
Harvard defended Khatami’s visit, claiming we must have an “open dialogue” with Iran and allow for a “free exchange of ideas.” But there can be no “free exchange of ideas” between a killer and those he seeks to kill–or between a brutal dictatorship and the free nation it seeks to annihilate.
 
Let’s stop appeasing Iran and make it clear that those who threaten the United States will not receive an “open dialogue,” but swift destruction

The Ayn Rand Institute, 2121 Alton Pkwy, Ste 250, Irvine, CA 92606 

The Terrorists’ Motivation: Islam
Their attempt to practice religion consistently explains the terrorists’ actions.

By: Edwin A. Locke and Alex Epstein

It is now five years since September 11, 2001–and since that horrific day we have witnessed numerous additional attacks by Islamic terrorists against the West. In the face of a seemingly never-ending supply of suicidal killers, many still do not understand the motivation of the terrorists. Commentators are eager to offer a bevy of pseudo-explanations–poverty, the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, etc.–while ignoring the motivation the terrorists themselves openly proclaim: Islam.

The near silence about the true role of Islam in motivating Islamic terrorists has two main causes: multiculturalism and religion. Multiculturalism asserts that all cultures are equal and therefore none may criticize another; intellectuals and politicians are therefore reluctant to declare the obvious superiority of Western culture to Islamic culture. And the strong commitment to religion of many Americans, especially conservatives, makes them reluctant to indict a religion as the cause of a massive evil. But if we are to identify the fundamental cause of the terrorists’ actions, we must understand at least two fundamental premises of the religion they kill for.

First, Islam, like all religions, rejects reason as a means of gaining knowledge and guiding action; it holds that all important truths are grasped by faith in supernatural beings and sacred texts. The Koran explicitly states that knowledge comes from revelation, not thinking. (Christianity in pure form entails a similar rejection of reason, but it has been heavily diluted and secularized since the Renaissance.) Islam advocates the subordination of every sphere of life to religious dogma, including the legal system, politics, economics, and family life; the word “Islam” means literally: submission. The individual is not supposed to think independently but to selflessly subordinate himself to the dictates of his religion and its theocratic representatives. We have seen this before in the West–it was called the Dark Ages.

Second, as with any religion that seeks converts, a derivative tenet of Islam is that it should be imposed by force (you cannot convince someone of the non-rational). The Koran is replete with calls to take up arms in its name: “fight and slay the Pagans wherever you find them . . . those who reject our signs we shall soon cast into the fire . . . those who disbelieve, garments of fire will be cut out for them; boiling fluid will be poured down on their heads . . . as to the deviators, they are the fuel of hell.”

These ideas easily lead to fanaticism and terrorism. In fact, what is often referred to as the “fanaticism” of many Muslims is explicitly endorsed by their religion. Consider the following characteristics of religious fanatics. The fanatic demands unquestioning obedience to religious dogma–so does Islam. The fanatic cannot be reasoned with, because he rejects reason–so does Islam. The fanatic eagerly embraces any call to impose his dogma by force on those who will not adopt it voluntarily–so does Islam.

The terrorists are not “un-Islamic” bandits who have “hijacked a great religion”; they are consistent and serious followers of their religion.

It is true that many Muslims who live in the West (like most Christians) reject religious fanaticism and are law-abiding and even loyal citizens, but this is because they have accepted some Western values, including respect for reason, a belief in individual rights, and the need for a separation between church and state. It is only to the extent that they depart from their religion–and from a society that imposes it–that they achieve prosperity, freedom, and peace.

In the last year, there has been more and more of a call for a “War of Ideas”–an intellectual campaign to win the “hearts and minds” of the Arab world that will discourage and discredit Islamic terrorism. Unfortunately, the centerpiece of this campaign so far has been to appeal to Muslims with claims that Islam is perfectly consistent with Western ideals, and inconsistent with terrorism. America has,with little success, groveled to so-called moderate Muslim leaders to strongly repudiate terrorism. (Those leaders have focused little energy on damning Islamic fanaticism, and much on the alleged sins of the U.S. government.) Such a campaign cannot work, since insofar as these “moderates” accept Islam, they cannot convincingly oppose violence in its name. A true “War of Ideas” would be one in which we proclaim loudly and with moral certainty the secular values we stand for: reason, rights, freedom, material prosperity, and personal happiness on this earth.

Edwin A. Locke, a professor emeritus of management at the University of Maryland at College Park, is a senior writer for the Ayn Rand Institute  (ARI) in Irvine, Calif. Alex Epstein is a junior fellow at ARI. The Institute promotes the ideas of Ayn Rand–best-selling author of “Atlas Shrugged” and “The Fountainhead” and originator of the philosophy she called “Objectivism.”

Both the above articles are from the Ayn Rand Institute

Many are the times that I have heard otherwise intelligent people ask why Islamist’s so hate others. The answers are in the very foundations in being a Muslim. We hear about Sunni and Shiite’s constantly. As if those two sects represent completely the followers of Mohamed. There are others though, and those groups appear to be the rotten apples that spoil the whole. Yet, if one looks deeper it is in fact, the whole of Islam that is at war with the rest of the world. Robert Spencer of http://jihadwatch.org/ has probably performed the most extensive investigation of modern Islam to date.

We, the rest of the entire world, are in a war of culture, and complete social domination with Islam. Read the Surya’s, listen to what the Imams say when speaking to their own. It is as simple as reading the United States Constitution. They mean what they say, and no university degree is needed to understand them.

Where then have the great thinkers and doers gone? Action, not emotion spelled out on blogs or letters to the editor get results. I submit that the only people that are actually doing something about this menace to our way of life are those in the military, and those that truly support them. One thing taken from Arab culture that I can honestly say that I can support is the concept of “The enemy of my enemy is my friend.” But that was/is also a trait of Celts in general and was passed down in oral traditions.