Archive for November, 2007

Northeast region Sportsman’s Advisory Group

November 18, 2007

buck-in-snow.jpgNORTHEAST REGION’S SPORTSMAN’S ADVISORY GROUP MEETING NOVEMBER 19

Hunters and anglers interested in learning more about issues facing Colorado’s wildlife are invited to attend a public meeting Nov. 19. The northeast region Sportsman’s Advisory Group will meet at 6:30 p.m. at the Division of Wildlife (DOW) Hunter Education Building at 6060 Broadway in Denver.

Since their inception three years ago, Sportsman’s Advisory Groups have worked with the DOW on wildlife management topics such as license fees and the Colorado Habitat Stamp Program.

Topics discussed at this meeting will include an update on shooting ranges on the Front Range, OHV legislation, and other issues of interest to sportsmen.

There are four regional Sportsmen’s Advisory Groups. “The Colorado Division of Wildlife is involved in many facets of outdoor recreation which affect a wide range of the public on the Front Range,” said Kathi Green, acting regional manager for the northeast. “This meeting offers a great opportunity for us to update our constituents on wildlife issues that we are working on, as well as hear concerns from those who attend.”

Questions about the meeting can be directed to Jennifer Churchill at 303-291-7234.
 
The Colorado Division of Wildlife is the state agency responsible for managing wildlife and its habitat, as well as providing wildlife related recreation. The Division is funded through hunting and fishing license fees, federal grants and Colorado Lottery proceeds through Great Outdoors Colorado.
 
 
 

For more information about Division of Wildlife go to: http://wildlife.state.co.us.

This program is one that seems to work pretty well. Be there if you ca!

Second Amendment verses D.C.

November 18, 2007

Mark Alexander writes a fine piece for the Patriot Post about upcoming litigation that will be presented to the Supreme Court. 

PATRIOT PERSPECTIVE

“The right of the people to keep and bear arms”

By Mark Alexander

There is yet another ideological contest brewing in our nation’s capitol, this one between two distinctively different groups in the federal judiciary: constitutional constructionists, who render decisions based on the “original intent” of our nation’s founding document, and judicial despots, who endorse the dangerously errant notion of a “Living Constitution.”

This is no trivial contest, however, and the outcome will have significant consequences across the nation.

The subject of this dispute is Washington, DC’s “Firearms Control Regulations Act of 1975,” which prohibits residents from owning handguns, ostensibly to deter so-called “gun violence.”

Of course, suggesting that violence is a “gun problem” ignores the real problem—that of socio-pathology and the culture which nurtures it. (See the Congressional Testimony of Darrell Scott, father of Rachel Scott, one of the children murdered at Columbine High School in 1999.)

In 1960 the frequency of violent crime in the District was 554/100,000 residents, and the murder rate was 10/100,000. In 2006, the frequency of violent crime in the District was 1,512/100,000 residents, and the murder rate was 29/100,000. That is a 200 percent increase, and according to the latest data from Washington Metro Police, violent crime is up 12 percent thus far this year.

Fact is, firearm restrictions on law-abiding citizens in Washington, and other urban centers, have created more victims while protecting offenders. There is nothing new about this correlation. As Thomas Jefferson noted in his Commonplace Book (quoting Cesare Beccaria), “Laws that forbid the carrying of arms… disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes… Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man.”

Simply put, violent predators prefer victims who have no means of self defense.

Most pro and con arguments about firearms are constructed around the crime debate, including excellent research by John Lott, whose book More Guns, Less Crime, clearly establishes that restrictive gun policies lead to higher crime rates.

The arguments from both sides in the current case in Washington are also constructed around the crime issue. However, the Second Amendment debate is not about crime, but about the rule of law—constitutional law. Fortunately, the appellate court for DC is making this distinction.

In March of this year, the U.S. District Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia struck down that federal jurisdiction’s restrictions on gun ownership, finding that the District is violating the Second Amendment’s prohibition on government infringement of “the right of the people to keep and bear arms.” The case has been appealed to the Supreme Court, and should the High Court accept the case, its ruling would be the first substantial decision on the scope of the Second Amendment since 1939.

At issue: Does the Second Amendment prohibit the government from infringing on the individual rights of citizens to keep and bear arms, or does it restrict the central government from infringing on the rights of the several states to maintain well-armed militias?

The intent of the Second Amendment, however, was abundantly clear to our Founders.

Indeed, in the most authoritative explication of our Constitution, The Federalist Papers, its principal author, James Madison, wrote in No. 46, “The advantage of being armed, which the Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation… forms a barrier against the enterprises of ambition, more insurmountable than any…”

Alexander Hamilton was equally unambiguous on the importance of arms to a republic, writing in Federalist No. 28, “If the representatives of the people betray their constituents, there is then no recourse left but in the exertion of that original right of self-defense…”

Justice Joseph Story, appointed to the Supreme Court by James Madison, wrote, “The right of the citizens to keep and bear arms has justly been considered as the palladium of the liberties of a republic; since it offers a strong moral check against the usurpation and arbitrary power of rulers; and will generally, even if these are successful in the first instance, enable the people to resist and triumph over them.”

In other words, the right of the people to bear arms is the most essential of the rights enumerated in our Constitution, because it ensures the preservation of all other rights.

Accordingly, the appellate court, in a 2-1 decision, ruled, “The Second Amendment protects an individual right to keep and bear arms. That right existed prior to the formation of the new government under the Constitution and was premised on the private use of arms for activities such as hunting and self-defense, the latter being understood as resistance to either private lawlessness or the depredations of a tyrannical government… The individual right facilitated militia service by ensuring that citizens would not be barred from keeping the arms they would need when called forth for militia duty.”

Additionally, the majority opinion notes, “The activities [the amendment] protects are not limited to militia service, nor is an individual’s enjoyment of the right contingent upon his or her continued or intermittent enrollment in the militia.”

The dissenting judge’s conclusion did not dispute the plain language of the Second Amendment’s prohibition on government, but he insists that the District is not a state, and is, thus, not subject to the prohibition.

This is ridiculous, of course, since such a conclusion would imply, by extension, that District residents are not subject to any protection under the Constitution.

The real contest here is one between activist judges, those who amend the Constitution by judicial diktat rather than its clearly prescribed method stipulated in Article V, and constructionist judges, those who properly render legal interpretation based on the Constitution’s “original intent.”

As Hamilton wrote in Federalist No. 81, “[T]here is not a syllable in the [Constitution] under consideration which directly empowers the national courts to construe the laws according to the spirit of the Constitution…” In other words, nothing in the Constitution gives judges the right to declare the Constitution means anything beyond the scope of its plain language.

However, activist judges, including those among generations of High Court justices, have historically construed the Second Amendment through a pinhole, while viewing the First Amendment through a wide-angle lens.

For example, though the First Amendment plainly says, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof,” judicial activists interpret this plain language to mean a public school coach can’t offer a simple prayer before a game.

Equally absurd, they argue that the First Amendment’s “freedom of speech” clause means burning the American flag, exploiting women for “adult entertainment,” or using taxpayer dollars to fund works of “art” such as a crucifix immersed in a glass of human waste.

If these same judicial despots misconstrued the Second Amendment as broadly as they do the first, Americans would have nukes to defend themselves from noisy neighbors.

The appeals case regarding the constitutionality of DC’s Firearms Control Regulations Act of 1975 is not about crime prevention, or whether the District is subject to prohibitions in the Bill of Rights. It is about the essence of our Constitution’s most important assurance that all Americans have the right to defend themselves against both predatory criminals and tyrannical governments. It is about the need for the High Court to reaffirm this right and stop the incremental encroachment of said right by infringements like that in the District, or more egregious encroachments like those found within the Feinstein-Schumer gun-control act.

Of self-government’s “important principles,” Thomas Jefferson wrote, “It is [the peoples’] right and duty to be at all times armed.” Indeed, the right of the people to keep and bear arms should not be infringed.

Taken As A Whole, The White South Remains Culpable For Past Injustices « Texas Liberal

November 15, 2007

Taken As A Whole, The White South Remains Culpable For Past Injustices « Texas Liberal

Well, here we go again it would seem. When confronted with argumentation based upon well respected theory’s of ethics this bastion argument of multiculturalism simply falls apart.

1: Can this be understood by the common man? As noted within the text it cannot.

Why bother going on? Kantian Ethical ideology requires the fulfillment of three requisites, and this fails the very first test.

If you want to know the other two, do your own research.

Viet Nam revisited

November 15, 2007

While checking the comments section I found a link to the veterans day post on this blog that linked to another blog. First, thanks for the link!

http://thisainthell.us/blog/2007/11/11/wreath-laying-at-arlington/

Then I proceeded to read the comments. Most were complementary in nature, as the photos and accompanying storyline were very well done. One fellow though seemed intent on turning it into a bitch fest of sorts. His half ass-ed rhetoric simply did not fulfill the “Cover My Ass” mission that was so readily apparent.

Well guess what? Most veterans of the Viet Nam war know that there were many that wished to serve but could not. By example, I knew people that could not get waivers that would allow them to serve. They had recurrent hepatitis, or were sole surviving sons of veterans killed in action. I suppose that just comes with the territory when you are born and raised on Camp Pendleton in Oceanside. By and far most of those people went on to serve in other ways. They became Policemen, Paramedics, and so on. A few got into trouble with the law, and later turned their lives around. The common thread is that they all, each and every one of them would have served if they would have been allowed to do so.

The complainer just offered up platitudes and half ass-ed excuses. He could have volunteered for the draft, or enlisted as a medic, or any of a myriad of other options. Now, he attempts to rationalize his behavior with excuses, while refusing to actually listen to the words of one that did put his butt on the line. Combat Veteran? No, as he freely admits in an honest way. I tell you what though folks, every single Marine that ever climbed down a cargo net, and every Paratrooper that ever stepped out the door of a perfectly good airplane, put their individual lives on the line. They didn’t have to do that, but they did. Perhaps that is the difference between those that are willing to sacrifice, and those that just sit on their collective asses and whine.

577 TRex

November 15, 2007

This video shows a lot of things, and not just the power 577 T Rex caliber. Admittedly from what little I have been able to find out about it, it appears to be one heck of a bruiser.

Now please notice a few things. Feet are placed in a very narrow stance, and shoulder position is atrocious, as is the over all line up with regards to the target area, as in posture.

How many other things reveal very poor marksmanship skills here?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CQJSZs-euZU

Honor Our Veterans Today « AccurateShooter.com Bulletin

November 11, 2007

Honor Our Veterans Today « AccurateShooter.com Bulletin

For those that enjoy coming here spewing hate, and the making of mischief, just remember that if it were not for the veterans, you would not be able to do those things.

All is not well among Latinos it would seem…

November 11, 2007

SANTIAGO, Chile – The Ibero-American summit ended on an unusually heated note Saturday, when an angry verbal spat culminated with the king of Spain telling Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez to “shut up.”

Source: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21724631/

It appears that the Spanish are little amused by the shenanigans of Hugo Chavez. The Castro wannabe went off in his usual manner, and was promptly put in his place so to speak.

Poachers Nabbed

November 11, 2007

BAYFIELD RESIDENTS HELP IN POACHING ARREST

Some alert residents helped the Colorado Division of Wildlife nab two poachers in Bayfield on Nov. 8.
 
Wayne Anderson of Colorado Springs and a 17-year-old male juvenile were arrested and charged with hunting in a careless manner and illegal possession of wildlife by the Colorado Division of Wildlife. Additional charges are pending. Both individuals are required to appear in court, could pay up to $2,000 in fines and face suspension of their hunting and fishing privileges.
 
About 10 a.m. Nov. 8, some Bayfield residents saw a man in a field near a developed area just south of U.S. Highway 160 near the Shell gas station. Witnesses reported that the man shot a large 6 x 6 mule deer buck that was walking across a light-industrial lot. The buck is one of several “Bayfield bucks” that live in an around Bayfield for much of the year. The men then left the scene.
 
Witnesses followed the men’s vehicle, wrote down the license plate number and a vehicle description and then called the Bayfield Marshal’s office. Bayfield officers located the men a short time later and held them until DOW officers arrived.
 
“This incident really shows how much the Division of Wildlife relies on citizens and other law enforcement agencies to help solve crimes against wildlife,” Patt Dorsey, DOW Area Wildlife Manager said.
 
Dorsey said this case is similar to the Greenmount Cemetery deer case in Durango that occurred in 2005. In both cases highly-visible big buck deer were treasured by the public and the public passed along information to DOW that helped solve the cases.
 
“If law enforcement can get good information there’s a great chance we can apprehend violators. There’s no doubt it would have been more difficult to make this case without the help of alert citizens,” Dorsey said.
 
Both witnesses were hunters that were alert and immediately contacted law enforcement. “Unfortunately, it’s not the good guys like our witnesses that make the news,” Dorsey said. “Poor hunter behavior makes the rest of the hunter community look bad.”
 
While poaching occurs year around in Colorado, it is most significant in the late fall when mule deer enter their breeding stage and the antlers of buck deer are fully developed. At this time of year deer are often in highly-visible areas and are gathered in groups.
 
If you seen any suspicious activity along roads where deer are nearby, please contact the Colorado Division of Wildlife at (970) 375-0855, Operation Game Thief at 1-877-265-6648; local law enforcement or the Colorado State Patrol.

For more information about Division of Wildlife go to: http://wildlife.state.co.us.

I am so sick of these thieves of the public resource! Thumbs up to the people of Bayfield, Colorado!

Carsons Post

November 11, 2007

Carsons Post

Carson nails this one! I am reminded of a seminar that I attended while in college about ethics in business. This practice of dropping people from the roles because they actually use the benefits that they payed for is, in my opinion, appalling.

Veterans Day 2007

November 11, 2007

My friend Roger Helle was 17 years old when he joined the Marine Corps. The product of a broken home, he was very insecure and hoped becoming a Marine would provide him the confidence he lacked.

In February 1966, five months into his first 13-month tour in Vietnam, Roger’s unit was searching for Viet Cong around Gia Le. Roger had walked point for patrols during the previous four months and had been shot once, so his intuition about the enemy’s presence was acutely tuned.

On a night mission to a small fishing village reportedly occupied by VC, Roger and 12 other Marines were moving down a trail lined with dense bamboo. His squad leader had taken Roger’s position as point man, and Roger’s instinct told him the squad was moving too fast along the trail. So urgent was his sense that something was wrong that he wanted to call out, but did not want to betray their position.

In an instant, gunfire erupted and a series of “daisy-chain” explosions propelled Roger and two other Marines over the vegetation into an adjacent rice paddy. As he slowly recovered from the shock of the concussion generated by the explosions, he could see green tracers from VC weapons cutting up and down the trail.

The ambush was over as quickly as it began, and more than 60 VC emerged like ghosts from the bamboo, killed the wounded Marines on the trail, collected their weapons and disappeared.

As Roger regained his senses, he pulled the other two Marines in the water to the edge of the rice paddy. He then pawed around in the muddy water for his M-14, and crawled back onto the trail to check for survivors among the ten remaining Marines—among his friends. The squad leader had taken 29 rounds. There were no survivors.

Roger recovered a radio under one of the dead, crawled back to the water’s edge with the wounded Marines, and called base camp with their coordinates. Within a half hour, Chinooks arrived with quick reaction squads to recover the injured and dead.

The two Marines Roger pulled from the water were evacuated to Da Nang, but died en route.

Roger was the sole survivor of that horrific ambush. There was no consolation for the “survivor’s guilt” he experienced—not the anger, not the nightmares—not for years.

In July 1970, two tours, two Purple Hearts and numerous other decorations later, Roger Helle, now a sergeant and platoon leader for a “killer team,” was walking point on a mission back to a village to destroy earthen tunnels used by the VC for escape and evasion.

Normally, a platoon leader would not take the point position in front of his men; if he was wounded or killed, it could threaten the continuity and survivability of the whole platoon. However, suffering four years of guilt after relinquishing his position on point and losing his entire squad, Roger was not about to ask one of his guys to walk point for what he considered a “mop-up” mission.

Their packs overloaded with C-4 explosives to destroy the VC tunnels, Roger’s platoon took frequent breaks. After one stop, he crossed a field about 50 yards ahead of his platoon to check for booby traps. While scanning the area, he sensed a glint of something in his peripheral vision, coming through the air. A grenade bounced off his leg—and a second later, exploded under his feet, violently impelling him backward and then to the ground.

Roger recounts that the detonation “felt like thousands of volts of electricity surging through my body.” After hitting the ground, he says, “My body would not respond to what my mind wanted it to do.”

Amazingly, he managed to stagger to his feet and wipe enough blood from his eyes to see an enemy soldier, about ten yards in front of him, point his weapon and fire. As the rifle recoiled, two rounds hit Roger, spinning him around and knocking him face down to the ground. As he rolled back toward the light of the sky, he could make out the silhouette of that NVA soldier standing above him. Their eyes met as the enemy thrust his bayonet into Roger’s abdomen.

Just a few seconds, and an eternity, had elapsed.

Roger’s platoon had instinctively hit the ground after the grenade detonated, but six of his men rose up in time to see the NVA soldier over their platoon leader. They fired on the enemy as he withdrew his bayonet, and he dropped a few feet from Roger.

Roger was riddled with shrapnel from the grenade, hit with two rifle rounds and bayoneted. Worse yet, the shrapnel had detonated one of the phosphorus grenades in his demolition bag. His clothing and body were on fire. He managed to get out of his burning flack jacket, but the pain racked his body.

At that moment, Roger says, “I was tired of the killing, tired of losing friends, tired of trying to make sense of the war and my life. I just wanted to die and have all this suffering be over.”

Roger was evacuated to the 95th EVAC Hospital, China Beach, where he underwent numerous surgeries. After six days at death’s door, he regained consciousness long enough to recognize a familiar voice on the ward—that of his brother Ron, asking a physician if Roger was there.

After telling Ron that his brother was going to die, a nurse led him to Roger’s bedside. Ron stood over Roger for a minute, trying to recognize what was left of his brother, and then started to sob, falling to the end of Roger’s bed in grief.

“Your brother is going to die.” The finality of those words were sinking in, as Ron wept, compelling Roger to pray, “God, if there really is a God… if you let me live, I’ll do anything you want.” With that, he fell unconscious again.

In the days that followed, Ron (who also had three Purple Hearts and later received the Navy Cross for jumping on a grenade to protect other Marines) never left the side of his brother. Roger saw many injured men brought into that ward and could only watch as life drained from their bodies. Miraculously, Roger’s condition improved. The road to recovery was long and hard, but 31 operations later, including four to reconstruct his face, recover he did.

Along the way, Roger met his Savior and fulfilled his promise to God—and he has served in full-time ministry since 1978. Indeed, in a war with no victors and replete with death, Roger found victory over death through Christ. He also met and married his wife and ministry partner, Shirley, and they now have two children and three grandchildren.

Today, some 37 years later, Roger appears as robust as a Patriot’s linebacker. He leads a challenging but successful discipleship to young people in the grip of life-controlling addictions. “Life is a gift from God,” says Roger. “What we do with it can be our gift to God.”

Roger’s ministry to others also includes 16 trips back to Vietnam since 1989, where he and “Vets with a Mission” have helped to build orphanages, clinics and hospitals for rural peasants ignored by their Communist government and they have supplied them with millions of dollars of donated medical supplies.

This Christian Soldier understands well the counsel of Ecclesiastes 3:1-3—“There is a time for everything, and a season for every activity under heaven: a time to be born and a time to die, a time to plant and a time to uproot, a time to kill and a time to heal.” His third book, “A time to kill and a time to heal,” takes its inspiration from that passage, as does Roger.

Regarding Vietnam and the current war in Iraq and Afghanistan, Roger is characteristically candid: “I have never regretted a minute of my service in Vietnam. That’s because I did not see the war the way the media portrayed it. I saw it through the eyes of the people that I lived with, the people of Vietnam who wanted to live free in peace.”

He continues, “As The Patriot noted years ago in its analysis of the media’s Vietnam war coverage, ‘General Vo Nguyen Giap, Vietnam’s most decorated military leader, wrote in retrospect that if not for the disunity created by John Kerry, Jane Fonda and their ilk, and promoted by the U.S. media, Hanoi would have ultimately surrendered’.”

Roger adds, “Vietnam will not be a failure if we learn the lessons of that conflict. Politicians cannot run the war—the generals must lead and lead well. The majority of people in Iraq and Afghanistan want peace and freedom, but the media’s portrayal of that critical conflict is just as prejudiced as it was during Vietnam—maybe more so. The Left, with the media’s help, may force the same scenario in Iraq that they forced in Vietnam, with the same consequences for the entire region. The vast majority of our Armed Forces in the region both understand and support our mission.”

To Roger, and to all fellow Patriots who have served our nation with courage and great sacrifice, we offer our heartfelt gratitude. You have honored your oath to “support and defend… so help me God,” as do those on the front line in the war with Jihadistan today. You have kept the flame of liberty, lit by our Founders, burning bright for future generations.

In 1918, the 11th hour of the 11th day of the 11th month marked the cessation of World War I hostilities. This date is now designated in honor of our veterans, and a focal point for national observance is the placing of a wreath at the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier in Arlington National Cemetery.

Today, nearly 24 million (eight percent) of our countrymen are veterans. Of those, 33 percent served in Vietnam, 18 percent in the Gulf War, 14 percent in WWII and 13 percent in Korea. About three percent served in Iraq and Afghanistan and other counter-terrorism theaters. More than 25 percent of those veterans suffer some disability.

Please pause with us at 1100 EST this Sunday to pray for all our veterans.

SOURCE: The Patriot Post