Archive for the ‘Law’ Category

2008 COLORADO BIG GAME

February 24, 2008

2008 COLORADO BIG GAME BROCHURE IS NOW AVAILABLEThe Colorado Division of Wildlife (DOW) 2008 Big Game Brochure is now available.

Hunters can obtain a hard-copy of the new brochure at license agents and DOW offices throughout the state.  A printable version is available online at the DOW Web site (www.wildlife.state.co.us).  Hunters who applied for a big game license in 2007 will automatically be mailed a copy of the new regulations.Changes for the 2008 season include the following:

Doe Deer Fees: License fees are reduced for doe deer hunting in specific units in the northwest portion of the state (units 11, 12, 13, 22, 23, 24).

Muzzleloading Restrictions:  Electronic and battery-operated devices are illegal during muzzleloading seasons.

Muzzleloader Transport:  There are new restrictions for carrying muzzleloaders on motor vehicles.  Electronic ignition muzzleloaders may be used during rifle season, but must be unloaded when possessed in a motor vehicle.

Ranching For Wildlife (RFW):  Most RFW licenses are now List A, which means you can only have 1 a year.  Special population management, youth, mobility-impaired and donation RFW licenses are List C.

Mandatory Bear and Mountain Lion Inspection Changes:  Hunters now must make sure their animal is unfrozen at the time of inspection.  A new regulation also allows the DOW to extract and retain a premolar tooth for analysis.

White-tailed Deer Hunts: More hunts are offered for white-tailed deer this year in eastern Colorado.

Chronic Wasting Disease Transport Restrictions:  Transport restrictions for hunters who harvest animals in CWD units have been eliminated.

Hunters are encouraged to apply for big game licenses online at the DOW Web site. By applying online hunters will save time and money over mailing in their applications. It is also much more difficult to make an error when applying online.

The DOW would like to remind big game hunters who are interested in applying for an elk, deer, pronghorn, moose or bear license that their applications must be postmarked before midnight of April 1.

Hunters who have questions regarding the application process can contact the DOW customer service center at (303) 297-1192

For more information about Division of Wildlife go to: http://wildlife.state.co.us.

BATFE nominee Michael Sullivan

February 24, 2008

Gun Owners of America’s Executive Director, Larry Pratt, today
blasted BATFE nominee Michael Sullivan as “unfit for office” —
characterizing him as being “as anti-gun as Ted Kennedy.”
In a series of answers to interrogatories submitted by Louisiana
Republican Senator David Vitter, Sullivan revealed that:

* He would not rescind BATFE’s policy of revoking federal licenses
for simple paperwork violations not involving “criminal intent;”

* He would not back down on BATFE’s illegal and abusive policies of
harassing gun show attendees;

* He supports anti-gun legislation by New York Democrat Chuck
Schumer, but opposes pro-gun legislation dealing with interstate
transfers sponsored by conservative Republicans;

* He defends revoking a license of a dealer with a 99.96% accuracy
rate — a rate which is far better than BATFE’s.

In fact, in dozens of responses to questions posed by Vitter,
Sullivan refused to even feign a conciliatory tone.

“I didn’t expect pro-gun conservatism from Sullivan,” said Pratt.
“But you would have thought he would have been less obvious in his
efforts to repeatedly poke Vitter in the eye.”

GOA commended Vitter’s intention to continue to “hold” Sullivan’s
nomination. “If Republicans expect the Second Amendment community to
support their presidential candidate in November,” said Pratt,
“they
may want to reconsider packing a GOP administration with anti-gun
zealots.”

Can we get a libertarian for Obama? « Bricks

February 17, 2008

Can we get a libertarian for Obama? « Bricks
Obama is anti Second Amendment.
Obama thinks he can talk our way out of terrorism.
Has Obama seen a tax that he didn’t like?
Obama attends a racist church.
This Conservative Libertarian refuses to vote for anyone like that.

Colorado Senate Bill 49

February 17, 2008

COLORADO: Colorado: Mandatory Storage Bill Sent to Senate Appropriations Committee! Senate Bill 49, which requires mandatory storage of all firearms, would force adults to put all their firearms under lock and key or face an undetermined misdemeanor penalty if a firearm is later used in a suicide or crime. This dangerous bill renders homeowners defenseless and gives criminals a clear advantage in home invasions. If passed, SB49 would add to the already cumbersome bureaucracy that affects gun shops, gun shows, or anywhere else firearms are sold, by requiring them to post a sign informing gun owners that they must lock up their guns. Please contact the members of the Senate Appropriations Committee and respectfully urge them to defeat this dangerous legislation. Contact information for the Senate Appropriations Committee members can be found here.

Source : NRA

Hasta la vista

February 15, 2008

In recent days, hard evidence has shown that illegal aliens in Arizona are “self-deporting” in droves, with many thousands more planning to leave soon. Mexican officials in Arizona are being inundated with requests for documents that will let them enroll their children in Mexican schools and return to Mexico without paying taxes on their furniture and other belongings. The mass exodus is in response to a new Arizona law that makes it nearly impossible for illegals to hold a job in the state, which boasts the highest number of illegals in its workforce—a whopping 12 percent. Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio has gotten in on the fun, of course, establishing a hotline for citizens to report those who hire illegals. Additionally, authority has been given to local law enforcement by Customs and Border Protection for the enforcement of federal immigration law, which should prove valuable. The new law goes into effect on 1 March. Who needs amnesty when simple law enforcement will do?

Source: Patriot Post

Warfront with Jihadistan: Justice served

February 15, 2008

From: The Patriot Post

“You can run, but you can’t hide.” So said President Ronald Reagan to terrorists nearly 20 years ago. This week, one jihadi who had been running was finally found, and let’s just say he won’t be in the terror business anymore. Senior Hizballah planner and operative Imad Mugniyah, wanted for more than 25 years, was killed Tuesday in Damascus by a car bomb, a fitting end for the man who pioneered vehicle bombings as an act of terror. Mugniyah was behind some of the most significant acts of terrorist violence ever perpetrated against Americans, including the 1983 bombings of the U.S. Embassy and the U.S. Marine barracks in Beirut, and the 1985 murder of U.S. Navy diver Robert Stethem during an airline hijacking. However, he had virtually disappeared since the early 1990s. Syrian, Iranian and Hizballah spokesmen immediately blamed Israel and the United States for the car bomb, a charge Israel promptly denied. The authors of this bombing will likely never be known, but the end result is the same: justice served at long last to a terrorist with the blood of hundreds on his hands.

Turning to the ongoing terrorist threat, two documents recently recovered by U.S. forces in Iraq offer insight into the current state of mind of al-Qa’ida in Iraq: gloom and doom. Citing the sweeping changes that have taken place since the U.S. troop surge began, one captured document’s author laments, “[T]he Islamic State of Iraq is faced with an extraordinary crisis, especially in al-Anbar.” Patriot readers will no doubt remember that just 18 months ago the Marines’ top intelligence officer judged that “there is almost nothing the U.S. military can do to improve the political and social situation [in Anbar].” While these documents represent the views of only two individuals, the enemy’s own words are the clearest possible indication of what effect the surge and the Sunni Awakening have had in Iraq, no matter how many times Harry Reid (D-nial) and Nancy Pelosi (D-featist) tell us it isn’t so.

“The gains [in Iraq] have not produced the desired effect, which is the reconciliation of Iraq. This is a failure. This is a failure! The troops have succeeded. God bless them. We owe them the greatest debt of gratitude, the sacrifice, their patriotism, and for their courage, and to their families as well. This is a disaster, and we cannot perpetuate it.” —House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, who, uh, supports the troops, God bless them!

Finally, justice for 9/11 may be served. On Monday, the Pentagon formally charged six jihadi suspects held at Guantanamo Bay with murder and war crimes related to the September 11th attacks, with Pentagon officials saying they will seek the death penalty should the suspects be convicted. Among the six is Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, suspected mastermind of the 9/11 attacks. Brigadier General Thomas Hartmann, legal adviser to the U.S. military-tribunal system, said of the 169 charges to be brought against the suspects, “These charges allege a long-term, highly sophisticated, organized plan by al-Qa’ida to attack the United States of America.” The other five jihadis include Mohammed al-Qahtani, the alleged 20th hijacker; Ramzi Binalshibh, liaison between the hijackers and al-Qa’ida; Ali Abd al-Aziz Ali (a.k.a. Ammar al-Baluchi), a nephew of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and lieutenant for operations; Mustafa Ahmad al-Hawsawi, one of al-Baluchi’s assistants; and Waleed bin Attash, who selected and trained some of the 9/11 hijackers. Needless to say, they are as fine a group as any to kick off the first capital trial under the military’s tribunal system.

Of course, the usual cadre of leftists, pacifists and dimwits (but we repeat ourselves) started howling that the indicted jihadis had been tortured and denied due process. We are not entirely clear on how making the Pentagon jump though years of legal hoops and modify its tribunal rules is not due process. As for torture, waterboarding may or may not be torture, but that has no bearing on the jihadis’ involvement in 9/11. We may soon see the Jihadi 6 sent to meet their 72 virgins.

Last week, we reported that the city of Berkeley, California, had resolved that the United States Marine Corps was not welcome to continue recruiting there. If they continued, it would be as “uninvited and unwelcome intruders.” It seems that news raised the ire of many a patriotic American, forcing the city council to reconsider—now they will not send their hateful letter to the USMC. Not only that, but they issued a statement saying they “deeply respect and support” the men and women who serve in the U.S. Armed Forces. Something makes us doubt their sincerity. Maybe it’s the fact that the angry anti-war group Code Pink still has a special parking space reserved outside the recruiting office.

In Congress, Rep. John Campbell (R-CA) and Sen. Jim DeMint (R-SC) responded by introducing the Semper Fi Act, which would strip Berkeley of all federal earmarks for fiscal year 2008, instead giving the money to the United States Marines for recruiting.

Apparently, the mayor of Toledo, Ohio, hadn’t seen this news as he ordered 200 members of Company A, 1st Battalion, 24th Marines to turn around and leave rather than engage in urban-patrol exercises in the downtown area. Despite the fact that Toledo police knew about the exercise days in advance and the Marines have held exercises there before, Mayor Carty Finkbeiner (yes, that’s his real name) “asked them to leave because they frighten people,” according to a spokesman. “I wish they would have told us this four hours ago,” Staff Sgt. Andre Davis said. Indeed, the aborted exercise—busing the Marines from Grand Rapids, Michigan—cost roughly $10,000.

Ohrah!

Gun Free Zones: Preferred by armed assailants. « In2thefray

February 15, 2008

Gun Free Zones: Preferred by armed assailants. « In2thefray
I started calling them “Free Fire Zones” as soon as the law was passed. It shocked the local authorities to be sure. Here was a Senior Paramedic saying that criminals would have the temerity to actually break the law, and shoot up a school?

Aside from what was noted above I simply have to ask this question. I know, perhaps it is asking the impossible, but reportedly there were well over one hundred people in that auditorium … Why the hell didn’t they just rush that punk and kick the living crap out of him?

Shock Doctrine: Part I « Publius2012’s Weblog

February 15, 2008

Shock Doctrine: Part I « Publius2012’s Weblog

This seems to be an exercise in historical rhetoric. Often using two unrelated things to hitch a point together somewhere else. Example: Noting that the actions of the C.I.A. went against the U.C.M.J. (Publius called it the “army’s” when in fact it governs all the services.) The C.I.A. is not a part of the military, sorry about that.

Then he calls out the Chicago School of Economics for abuses that were carried out in Brazil..? If he actualy knew anything about what is taught in Social Economics he would know better than to spout such nonsense.

He speaks about American mining operations in South America as if the businesses did nothing for the local population. Schools must not matter, nor fresh running water and sewer systems. Just to name a few.

Utopia will never happen, period. Free Markets do however offer the best hope for mankind to get near that state.

GOA Files Blockbuster Brief

February 14, 2008

GOA Files Blockbuster Brief Before The U.S. Supreme Court!– Pratt hits the airwaves, selling the pro-gun position in the courtof public opinion Gun Owners of America E-Mail Alert8001 Forbes Place, Suite 102, Springfield, VA 22151Phone: 703-321-8585 / FAX: 703-321-8408http://www.gunowners.org Tuesday, February 12, 2008 Gun Owners of America filed its brief yesterday before the U.S.Supreme Court in defense of Dick Anthony Heller, who was denied theright to own a gun in the nation’s capital as a result of thedraconian gun ban which exists there. In this hard-hitting brief, GOA takes aim at the weak arguments putforth by both the DC government and the Bush Administration. Butmore than that, GOA examines the favorable text and context of theSecond Amendment in great detail, while also documenting the pro-gunhistory that formed the backdrop of its inclusion into the Bill ofRights. The GOA brief even presents the greatest reason for the right to keepand bear arms, stating that “the Second Amendment right is to beexercised as a last resort to guard against tyranny.” GOA’s Executive Director, Larry Pratt, has hit the airwaves recently,appearing on many talk shows and in newspapers to differentiate theGOA approach from the sullied road the President has taken. Pratt,along with other GOA spokesmen, has argued that the “bomb” whichBush’s Solicitor General dropped last month (when he submitted hisbrief) would destroy the Second Amendment.
After all, the Bush administration’s approach is that any and allguns can be controlled or banned if a federal court finds that to be”reasonable.” The GOA approach differs from many of the briefs that are beingsubmitted to the high Court. For example, one brief which is beingsubmitted by several legislators highlights Congress’ position on theSecond Amendment over the years. This can be a useful approach, tobe sure. But while the congressional brief concedes that the DC Council mayhave gone too far, it also says it’s appropriate for the legislativebranch to pass restrictions upon our Second Amendment rights — astance which is, in principle, not too different from the one theU.S. Solicitor General has filed. That’s where the GOA brief draws a “bright line” in the sand byrepeating the amendment’s wording “shall not be infringed” over andover again. For example, our brief states: [T]he argument that “the right of the people” is subject to reasonable regulation and restriction tramples on the very words of the Second Amendment, reading the phrase — “shall not be infringed” — as if it read “shall be subject only to reasonable regulation to achieve public safety.” The GOA brief can be read online athttp://www.gunowners.org/fs0802.pdf on the GOA website. Severalpro-gun groups joined GOA, including Gun Owners Foundation, GunOwners of California, Maryland Shall Issue, Inc., Virginia CitizensDefense League, among others.
You will remember that last month, GOA alerted you to Rep. VirgilGoode’s efforts to get President Bush to pull his brief before theCourt. Thanks to your efforts, Rep. Goode has almost 50congressional signatories on his letter. While the letter hasalready been sent to the President, Goode continues to solicit evenmore signatories and is sending those names to Bush as well. (GOAwill provide you further updates and a list of the congressman whohave cosigned the letter in an upcoming alert.) Gun Owners of America is committing a significant portion of ouravailable resources as we are fighting this battle in the courts, inthe Congress and in the media. If you would like to help do your part in covering the tremendouscosts associated with this effort, please go tohttp://www.gunowners.com/heller.htm to make a tax-deductiblecontribution. Thank you so much.

Vice President Cheney Signs On

February 14, 2008

Vice President Cheney Signs On
To Congressional Amicus Curiae Brief:
Affirms Unequivocal Support Of Second
Amendment As An Individual Right

Today, in his capacity as President of the United States Senate, Vice President Cheney signed on to the congressional amicus curiae brief affirming the individual rights view of the Second Amendment. As Americans, we are grateful and fortunate to have a friend of freedom in the Vice President.

NRA And U.S. Lawmakers Join D.C. V. Heller Plaintiffs In Filing Briefs With U.S. Supreme Court: On Thursday, February 7, NRA and the NRA Civil Rights Defense Fund submitted an amicus curiae brief to the United States Supreme Court in the case of District of Columbia v. Heller. This “friend of the court” brief supports a lower federal appeals court decision holding that the Second Amendment protects an individual right to keep and bear arms, and asserts that the D.C. bans on handguns, on carrying firearms within the home, and on possession of loaded or operable firearms for self-defense violate that fundamental right.