Archive for the ‘News’ Category

More on Absolut

April 11, 2008

A recent advertisement by Swedish vodka maker Absolut has left the company shaken after causing quite a stir. The Mexican ad depicts a map of North America with pre-1848 borders. The southwestern U.S. (Texas, New Mexico, Arizona, Colorado, Utah, Nevada, California and portions of other states) is shown as part of Mexico, beneath the slogan “In an Absolut World,” part of the company’s advertising portfolio illustrating “ideal” scenarios. After calls from U.S. citizens for a boycott, the vodka maker offered a limp-wristed faux apology: “In no way was it meant to offend or disparage, nor does it advocate an altering of borders, nor does it lend support to any anti-American sentiment, nor does it reflect immigration issues.” It concluded by saying, “This is a genuine and sincere apology.” El contrero, Absolut. When you have to say an apology is “genuine and sincere,” it’s pretty much guaranteed that the opposite is true.

source: Patriot Post

I like the “limp wristed” part, it is about the only thing that I had not heard about this so far! 🙂

Profiles of valor: USA Sgt. Marshall

April 11, 2008

U.S. Army Sergeant Benjamin Marshall was on a house-clearing mission in Tharthar, Iraq, in July 2006 when he and two fellow soldiers came under enemy fire. The two men on point were Staff Sergeant Christopher Schroeder and Sergeant William Wills. Schroeder was hit with two AK-47 rounds in the surprise attack and along with Wills he took cover in a room of the farmhouse. Marshall and the Iraqi interpreter managed to get out of the house unseen, but Marshall knew his comrades were in trouble without his help. He took up a position in a ramshackle chicken coop nearby in order to direct fire at the al-Qa’ida fighters. His counterattack spared Wills and Schroeder, though Marshall didn’t know for sure as he could only hear gunfire and jihadis chanting. Soon, a Humvee with backup arrived. Marshall shouted an alert to them of the situation, but that gave away his position and he immediately started taking fire. The diversion was just what Marshall hoped for, however, and with the Humvee’s help, he was able to get close to the house and evacuate Wills and Schroeder. In July 2007, Marshall was awarded the Bronze Star with combat “V” for valor.

Way to go Soldier!

Just when you thought there was no hope!

April 11, 2008

My home state of California well deserves it’s reputation as a bastion of authoritarianism and big government nanny regulations, as well as that of destroyer of liberty and economic roadblock to the success of the rest of the nation. “So goes California, so goes the nation” is a now old saying that has all too often proved true. Perhaps though, sometimes, this is a good thing, read on:

The California Supreme Court ruled this week on San Francisco’s voter-approved ban of handguns. The ban never took effect because the National Rifle Association (NRA) sued the city the day after it passed. The Court upheld rulings by lower courts that the ban violated California’s state law regarding the regulation of firearms, though it did not address the Second Amendment as does the DC case currently before the U.S. Supreme Court. “Law-abiding citizens are part of the solution, not part of the problem of violent crime,” said Chuck Michel, lawyer for the plaintiffs in the NRA suit. “The authority of local cities to over-regulate firearms is very limited.” By the Second Amendment, we might add.

source: Patriot Post

#52: The 50’s Housewife Guide To Terrorists « The Panda Page

April 10, 2008

#52: The 50’s Housewife Guide To Terrorists « The Panda Page

Stupid is, as stupid does, defined.

Don’t Come Back, Jimmy! « Freedom Ain’t Free & Take Our Country Back

April 10, 2008

Don’t Come Back, Jimmy! « Freedom Ain’t Free & Take Our Country Back

Once in a while I stumble onto a blog that is really impressive. This is one of them. In fact, this is on a par with the work of Robert Spencer when it comes to the religion of peace. If only the rest of the civilized world would wake up and smell the Imam’s.

Is the west perfect? No, of course not, and we make no such claim. But what about the blood thirsty purveyors of a religion founded by a pedophile?

Jimmy Carter was the worst of the worse, period.

S. 2739.

April 8, 2008

 

From: Gun Owners of America [Gun_Owners_of_America@capwiz.mailmanager.net]  
Sent: 4/8/2008 1:13:56 PM
To:
Subject:

“Make-Or-Break” Day On Your Right To Carry A Gun For
Self-Protection In A
National Park
— Tell your Senators to vote against “Cloture” on the Parks Bill

Gun Owners of America E-Mail Alert
8001 Forbes Place, Suite 102, Springfield, VA 22151
Phone: 703-321-8585 / FAX: 703-321-8408
http://www.gunowners.org

Tuesday, April 8, 2008

What happens tomorrow — Wednesday, April 9, 2008 — will probably determine
whether or not you will be able to carry a gun in a national park.

The first key vote will be a vote to cut off debate on the motion to take up
the “alternate” version of the “parks bill.” That
bill is S. 2739.

Why, you might ask, is such an arcane procedural vote so important?

To answer that question, it is necessary to look at a little history:
Earlier this year, the first “parks” bill came onto the
Senate calendar. It
was not a good bill: In terms of private property rights, it was one of the
biggest federal land grabs in American history. In addition, it would grant
another liberal anti-gun congressman to the Mariana Islands.

But Senator Tom Coburn was able to use the Senate rules to secure a right to
offer his gun amendment to that first bill — an amendment which would
affirm your right to carry a firearm for self-defense in most national
parks.

The Senate Democratic leadership was terrified. If presidential candidates
Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama were required to cast an anti-gun vote on
the eve of the presidential election, it could arguably cost Democrat states
like Tennessee, Kentucky, Pennsylvania, West Virginia, Arkansas, and New
Hampshire in November.

So Democratic leader Harry Reid (D-NV) came up with a plan: He would kill
the bill on which Coburn had the right to offer his gun amendment. Instead,
he would bring up a similar bill — but one on which Coburn had not secured
a parliamentary right to offer the gun amendment. Once the new
“alternate”
gun bill was pending, Reid would add so many amendments that the Coburn gun
amendment could not be offered.

So, to recapitulate: The “alternate” parks bill — S. 2739 —
exists for
one reason and one reason only: to block consideration of a Coburn
amendment to allow you to use a gun to defend yourself in a national park.

ACTION: Tell your Senator to vote against cloture on the motion to proceed
to the parks bill. You can use the pre-written message below and send it
as an e-mail by visiting the GOA Legislative Action Center at
http://www.gunowners.org/activism.htm (where phone and fax numbers are also
available).

—– Pre-written letter —–

Dear Senator:

What happens on Wednesday, April 9, 2008 will probably determine whether or
not Americans will be able to carry a gun in a national park.

The key vote will be a vote to cut off debate on the motion to take up the
“alternate” version of the “parks bill.” That bill
is S. 2739.

This “alternate” parks bill exists for one reason and one
reason only: to
block consideration of a Coburn amendment to allow Americans to use a gun to
defend themselves in many national parks. Coburn had secured the right to
offer this amendment to the original bill, S. 2483.

The procedure which is being used to shut out gun owners is not only unfair;
it is sneaky and underhanded.

Please do not let it succeed.

Gun Owners of America has told me it will rate this vote as a gun vote.

Sincerely,

HABITAT STAMP SALES BENEFIT WILDLIFE AND WILDLIFE RECREATION

April 8, 2008

Outdoor enthusiasts who purchase a Colorado Wildlife Habitat Stamp are beginning to see a return on their investment.  The Colorado Division of Wildlife (DOW) announced today that more than 19,000 acres have been set aside for wildlife and wildlife-related recreation since the DOW started selling Habitat Stamps two years ago. 
 
“What we have seen so far is just the tip of the iceberg,” said Dan Prenzlow, a DOW liaison on the Colorado Wildlife Habitat Stamp Committee.  By combining money collected from habitat stamp sales with grants from Great Outdoors Colorado (GoCO) and other sources, the DOW is working on dozens of other projects that could protect up to 65,000 more acres of wildlife habitat in the near future.
 
Some of the wildlife habitat was purchased by the DOW, but most of it is preserved through permanent conservation easements that protect important winter range and migration corridors for deer and elk.  Other acquisitions and easements have set aside critical land for sage grouse and opened up fishing access for anglers.
 
The habitat stamp program was started in 2006 as a way to preserve and enhance wildlife habitat.  Sales averaged $3.5 million in the first two years. That money was used to match a variety of grant programs to leverage more than $38 million for habitat protection efforts in Colorado.
 
The habitat stamp program is overseen by a nine-member citizen’s committee appointed by the Governor.  The committee has reviewed dozens of proposals to protect critical wildlife habitat.  Each proposal receives a thorough review and is ranked according to its merits.  Final approval comes from the Colorado Wildlife Commission.
 
“The habitat stamp program was set up to benefit the wildlife of Colorado for future generations,” said committee chairman Mark Smith of Center, Colo.  “Our selection process is designed to protect the greatest number of species possible. As stewards of our resources, the committee’s goal is to ensure our grandchildren and their grandchildren will be able to enjoy Colorado’s natural resources.”
 
Properties protected though the Colorado Wildlife Habitat Stamp Program as of April 10, 2008:

  • Conejos County: Kendrick Parcel, 200 acres, fee title, in-holding at existing La Jara Creek SWA, big game winter range and trout fishing. $400,000.
  • El Paso County: Ramah Reservoir, 158 acres, fee title in-holding at existing SWA, warm-water fishing and waterfowl access. $120,000.
  • Grand County: Wolf-Taussig, 3,140-acre easement, big game winter range. $3.5 million.
  • Gunnison County: Miller Ranch, 1,604 acres, fee title, big game winter range and migration, Gunnison sage grouse habitat and public access. $6.5 million.
  • Lake County: Hardeman Property, 1.25 miles of Arkansas River, perpetual fishing access and bighorn sheep winter range. $99,000.
  • Moffat County: Raftopoulos Two Bar Ranch, 3,184-acre easement for big game winter range and greater sage grouse protection, including 2,400 acres hunting access and fishing stream access in the Cold Springs Mountain area. $1.7 million.
  • Rio Blanco County: Berryman Ranch, 2,905-acre easement, big game winter range and migration. $2.5 million.
  • Rio Blanco County: Lunney Mountain, 2,027-acre easement, big game winter range and sharp-tail grouse habitat. $1 million.
  • Rio Blanco County: Wenschoff Ranch, 525-acre easement, big game winter range and migration, greater sage grouse habitat. $1.2 million.
  • Routt County: Adobe Ridge, 561-acre easement, big game winter range and migration, sharp-tail grouse habitat. $480,000.
  • Routt County: Circle 8 Ranch, 637-acre easement, big game winter range and migration, sharp-tail and greater sage grouse habitat. $472,000.
  • Routt County: Wolf Mountain, 2,711-acre easement, big game winter range and migration, sharp-tail and greater sage grouse habitat protection, and trout fishing. $1.75 million.
  • San Miguel County: Baker Ranch, 1,249-acre easement, big game winter range and migration, Gunnison sage grouse habitat.  $850,000.
  • San Miguel County: Elk Creek Ranch, 350 acres, fee title, big game winter range and migration, Gunnison sage grouse habitat. $924,000.

 
The Colorado Wildlife Habitat Stamp was created by House Bill 1266 during the 2005 legislative session.  The bill authorizes the sale of the stamp from 2006 through 2010, with an option to continue past the 2010 deadline with authorization from the Colorado Legislature. 
 
HB 05-1266 mandates that 60 percent of the money collected must be spent on big game winter range and big game migration corridors. The remaining money can be used on other habitat types critical to wildlife in Colorado, including wetlands, riparian, shortgrass prairie, and forest land projects.
 
“There are many wildlife species that benefit by protecting big game habitat,” said Prenzlow. “Bears, mountain lions, bighorn sheep, hawks, eagles, and a variety of grouse, waterfowl songbirds and other mammal species will benefit from the habitat stamp program.  Protecting the land that is used by big game goes well beyond just helping the deer and elk herds in the state.”
 
The habitat stamp costs $5 with the purchase of each hunting or fishing license up to a maximum of $10 per year. People who do not hunt or fish can purchase a stamp for $10.25 which includes the Colorado Search and Rescue fee.  Anyone between the ages of 19 – 64 is required to have a valid Colorado Wildlife Habitat Stamp to enter a DOW managed State Wildlife Area.
 
Habitat stamps can be purchased wherever hunting or fishing licenses are sold, as well as on the DOW’s Web site at www.wildlife.state.co.us or by phone at (800) 244-5613.
 
 
The Colorado Division of Wildlife is the state agency responsible for managing wildlife and wildlife habitat, as well as providing wildlife related recreation and maintaining a balance between human activities and wildlife.  Funding for the Division of Wildlife comes from the sale of hunting and fishing licenses and the habitat fees collected in conjunction with those sales.  The Division does not receive tax dollars from the Colorado general fund.
 

Florida Pondering TABOR-esque Law

April 8, 2008

Jon Caldara from “The Independence Institute” posted this the other day. Reprinted with permission, and some commentary.

  1. Tabor only gave you back money that the state took in excess from your paycheck.
  2. Tabor is what kept Colorado’s head above water when the rest of the country went broke during the last economic down turn.
  3. Those big returns assured that you didn’t underpay taxes and all the untoward things that go along with that.

Florida Pondering TABOR-esque Law

Posted by Jon Caldara on Apr 03 2008 | Government Largess

Want to help Floridians enjoy the benefits of TABOR type legislation? Well, all you have to do is write one email outlining how TABOR has positively effected your life. Here is the low down from Amy Oliver:

“Our conservative brethren in Florida need our help and time is of the essence. Right now TABOR type legislation is being debated by a special Constitutional committee comprised of 25 private citizens, not elected officials. They have the power to put a positive version of TABOR on the ballot as a proposed amendment to the state constitution. The proposal is called the “Taxpayer Protection Amendment” or CP-45. The vote will be on Friday so if you could take just a few minutes to email (email address is below) Florida’s Constitutional committee about how TABOR has been beneficial in Colorado and send this email/suggestion along to some of your friends to do the same it would help both Florida and Colorado.
The ideal letters should be personal testimonials of how a revenue cap and voter approval has helped them. They don’t even necessarily need to mention the word “TABOR”, since we’re marketing this proposal as ‘different from TABOR’. Basically, if citizens can communicate that TABOR has been beneficial to taxpayers and the state that is the objective.

Please send an email to:
frier.nancy@leg.state.fl.us

Thank you for your help.”

Your input is critical because as Ben DeGrow points out, the opposition will be in full on spin and distort mode. Do you blame them? How difficult the task to argue against citizens keeping more of their own money.

SOURCE: http://caldara.i2i.org/?p=161#comment-323

Post Office bans harmless items

April 7, 2008

The U.S.P.S. has waded into the gun control debate with all the grace of a walrus and the intelligence of a tick. Truly, this a great example of an old saying; “Stupid is as stupid does.”

 

Gun Owners of America E-Mail Alert
8001 Forbes Place, Suite 102, Springfield, VA 22151
Phone: 703-321-8585 / FAX: 703-321-8408
http://www.gunowners.org

Friday, April 4, 2008

The Post Office is wading into the gun control debate.

That’s right, the U.S. Postal Service is trying to keep people from shipping
replica or inert munitions through the mail.

They have no authority in the law, since Congress has kept for itself the
power to decide what can and cannot be shipped. But the Post Office is
trying to say that replica or inert munitions are hazardous!

Gun Owners of America’s attorneys just found out about this outrageous
proposal which was issued by the Post Office. Although the deadline for
postmarking is Monday, April 7, our attorneys say that e-mails and letters
should be sent anyway.

If you are a re-enactor or collector of replica or inert munitions, you are
in the Post Office crosshairs. If you are not directly involved in this,
you should still be outraged that a bunch of bureaucrats are trying to
further restrict Second Amendment activity.

By the way, there is one interesting dimension to all of this: Canada wants
the US to help shut off shipment of these items into Canada. So it looks
like our bureaucrats are eager to appease other governments by changing our
laws to make them as bad as our neighbors’.

You can read the Postal Service proposed regulations here:
http://uxoinfo.com/blogcfc/client/enclosures/Proposed-Ban_ShippingInert.pdf

You can read GOA’s comments to the Postal Service here:
http://www.gunowners.org/fs0803.pdf

ACTION: Please send your comments to the Post Office ASAP. The letter must
be postmarked by Monday, April 7, 2008. Here’s the contact information.

TITLE: 73 Fed. Reg. 12321: New Standards Prohibit the Mailing of Replica or
Inert Munitions

E-MAIL: michael.f.lee@usps.gov

SNAIL MAIL:
Manager, Mailing Standards
United States Postal Service
475 L’Enfant Plaza, S.W., Room 3436
Washington, DC 20260-3436

A New, Broader “Assault Weapons” Ban Nationwide

April 7, 2008
Setting The Stage Locally For A New, Broader “Assault Weapons” Ban Nationwide
 
Friday, April 04, 2008
 
 If you don’t live in a state that has an “assault weapon” ban, that issue might be off your radar screen these days. After all, the federal ban–on standard-capacity magazines and semi-automatics with a certain combination of cosmetic features–has been defunct for nearly four years. 

But anti-gun politicians and news media at the state level are ginning up for a 2009 campaign to enact a ban like that proposed by Rep. Carolyn McCarthy (D-N.Y.), because they know that both of the front-runners for the Democrat Party presidential nomination would sign such a ban into law in a New York minute. 

Knowing that the political landscape could be decisively different in 2009, anti-gun politicians and news media are currently trying to resurrect the “assault weapon” issue at the state level, to place it back on the political front burner.

First, newspapers began clamoring for a ban in Florida. Now, the Associated Press (AP) is trying to bolster support for a ban introduced in Louisiana, alleging an increase in crimes with AK-47-type rifles, based entirely upon BATFE firearm tracing data–even though the Congressional Research Service has repeatedly said traces cannot be used to determine how often any type of gun is used in crime. For some reason, AP also devoted attention to the fact that fully-automatic AKs are used by combatants in Iraq and Afghanistan, even though that is irrelevant to semi-automatic AKs branded with the phony “assault weapon” name.  AP also claimed that AKs fire high-velocity ammunition, even though 7.62×39 is almost the lowest velocity .30 caliber rifle round in existence, similar to, but less powerful than, the modestly powered .30-30 Winchester, the most popular deer rifle in U.S. history. 

Needless to say, even though the “assault weapon” issue is more than 20 years old, reporters still are not getting it right, either because they are biased or because they are too lazy to research the subject. NRA members can help set the record straight by sending letters to the editors of their local newspapers.  For information on writing letters to your local newspaper, please click here.

 

source: http://www.nraila.org/Legislation/Federal/Read.aspx?id=3776