Archive for the ‘War’ Category

It is about time!

April 2, 2008

SIERRA VISTA, Ariz. – The pilot has gone through his checklist and taxied his plane into position for takeoff.

He gets clearance from the control tower, throttles forward and — from the ground — guides his unmanned aircraft into the sky along the Mexican border to watch for drug traffickers and illegal immigrants, part of a bird’s-eye patrol that authorities hope to expand.

Four Predator B drones have become fixtures over Arizona since October 2006, and two more will join them soon, Juan Munoz-Torres, a Customs and Border Protection spokesman, said Wednesday.

~snip~  http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080402/ap_on_re_us/border_drones

Too bad they are not armed with Hellfire missles…

Navy SEAL killed in Iraq to get Medal of Honor

March 31, 2008

I’ve posted elsewhere on this blog about this action involving this group of American Warriors. This was an unusual situation, and these are, and were unusual men. I can remember Seals coming into Ross – Sands Delicatessen in Point Loma. They were boisterous, and serious all at the same time. Man, could those guys eat!

Fair winds and following seas…

 ‘He never took his eye off the grenade,’ attack survivor says of his heroism

SAN DIEGO – An elite Navy SEAL who threw himself on top of a grenade in Iraq to save his comrades will be posthumously awarded the nation’s highest military tribute, a White House spokeswoman said Monday.

The Medal of Honor will be awarded to Petty Officer 2nd Class Michael A. Monsoor. His family will receive the medal during a White House ceremony April 8.

Monsoor is the fifth person to receive the honor since the beginning of the Iraq and Afghanistan wars.

“Petty Officer Monsoor distinguished himself by extraordinary heroism on Sept. 29, 2006,” press secretary Dana Perino told reporters during a briefing aboard Air Force One as President Bush headed to Europe for a NATO summit.

Monsoor was part of a sniper security team in Ramadi with three other SEALs and eight Iraqi soldiers, according to a Navy account. An insurgent fighter threw the grenade, which struck Monsoor in the chest before falling in front of him.

Monsoor then threw himself on the grenade, according to a SEAL who spoke to The Associated Press in 2006 on condition of anonymity because his work requires his identity to remain secret.

‘We owe him’
“He never took his eye off the grenade, his only movement was down toward it,” said a 28-year-old lieutenant, who suffered shrapnel wounds to both legs that day. “He undoubtedly saved mine and the other SEALs’ lives, and we owe him.”

Two SEALs next to Monsoor were injured; another who was 10 feet to 15 feet from the blast was unhurt. Monsoor, from Garden Grove, Calif., was 25 at the time.

Monsoor, a platoon machine gunner, had received the Silver Star, the third-highest award for combat valor, for his actions pulling a wounded SEAL to safety during a May 9, 2006, firefight in Ramadi.

He was posthumously awarded the Bronze Star for his sacrifice in Ramadi.

Sixteen SEALs have been killed in Afghanistan. Eleven of them died in June 2005 when a helicopter was shot down near the Pakistan border while ferrying reinforcements for troops pursuing al-Qaida militants.

There are about 2,300 of the elite fighters, based in Coronado and Little Creek, Va.

The Navy is trying to boost the number by 500 — a challenge considering more than 75 percent of candidates drop out of training, notorious for “Hell Week,” five days of continual drills by the ocean broken by only four hours sleep total.

Monsoor made it through training on his second attempt.

source: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23886008

Command releases report

March 28, 2008

United States Joint Forces Command (USJFCOM)  has released online an unclassified redacted version of the Joint Center for Operational Analysis (JCOA)-sponsored study entitled “The Iraqi Perspectives Project — Saddam and Terrorism:  Emerging Insights from Captured Iraqi Documents.”


By USJFCOM Public Affairs

(NORFOLK, Va. – March 20, 2008) — United States Joint Forces Command (USJFCOM) has released online an unclassified redacted version of the Joint Center for Operational Analysis (JCOA)-sponsored study entitled “The Iraqi Perspectives Project — Saddam and Terrorism:  Emerging Insights from Captured Iraqi Documents.”

In order to accommodate continuing public interest and to provide an accurate, definitive report, this online version is made available to improve efficient delivery of this material.

The five volumes of the document, linked below, documents the history of the Saddam regime.   

The Institute for Defense Analyses produced the report under contract for the command as part of the broader Iraqi Perspectives Project. 

The Iraqi Perspectives Project examines operational and strategic insights and lessons from the perspective of former senior Iraqi decision-makers through the analysis of primary source material such as interviews and captured regime documents. 

The study’s authors completed the report after screening more than 600,000 captured documents including several hundred hours of audio and video files archived by U.S. Department of Defense. 

As part of USJFCOM, JCOA studies strategic and operational lessons from recent and ongoing military operations in order to improve the joint force.

Volume 1 contains the executive summary of the report. Volumes 2-5 provide supporting documentations.

Click on the links below to download each volume individually.

Volume 1
Volume 2
Volume 3
Volume 4
Volume 5

http://www.jfcom.mil/newslink/storyarchive/2008/pa032008.html

Warfront with Jihadistan: Justice served

February 15, 2008

From: The Patriot Post

“You can run, but you can’t hide.” So said President Ronald Reagan to terrorists nearly 20 years ago. This week, one jihadi who had been running was finally found, and let’s just say he won’t be in the terror business anymore. Senior Hizballah planner and operative Imad Mugniyah, wanted for more than 25 years, was killed Tuesday in Damascus by a car bomb, a fitting end for the man who pioneered vehicle bombings as an act of terror. Mugniyah was behind some of the most significant acts of terrorist violence ever perpetrated against Americans, including the 1983 bombings of the U.S. Embassy and the U.S. Marine barracks in Beirut, and the 1985 murder of U.S. Navy diver Robert Stethem during an airline hijacking. However, he had virtually disappeared since the early 1990s. Syrian, Iranian and Hizballah spokesmen immediately blamed Israel and the United States for the car bomb, a charge Israel promptly denied. The authors of this bombing will likely never be known, but the end result is the same: justice served at long last to a terrorist with the blood of hundreds on his hands.

Turning to the ongoing terrorist threat, two documents recently recovered by U.S. forces in Iraq offer insight into the current state of mind of al-Qa’ida in Iraq: gloom and doom. Citing the sweeping changes that have taken place since the U.S. troop surge began, one captured document’s author laments, “[T]he Islamic State of Iraq is faced with an extraordinary crisis, especially in al-Anbar.” Patriot readers will no doubt remember that just 18 months ago the Marines’ top intelligence officer judged that “there is almost nothing the U.S. military can do to improve the political and social situation [in Anbar].” While these documents represent the views of only two individuals, the enemy’s own words are the clearest possible indication of what effect the surge and the Sunni Awakening have had in Iraq, no matter how many times Harry Reid (D-nial) and Nancy Pelosi (D-featist) tell us it isn’t so.

“The gains [in Iraq] have not produced the desired effect, which is the reconciliation of Iraq. This is a failure. This is a failure! The troops have succeeded. God bless them. We owe them the greatest debt of gratitude, the sacrifice, their patriotism, and for their courage, and to their families as well. This is a disaster, and we cannot perpetuate it.” —House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, who, uh, supports the troops, God bless them!

Finally, justice for 9/11 may be served. On Monday, the Pentagon formally charged six jihadi suspects held at Guantanamo Bay with murder and war crimes related to the September 11th attacks, with Pentagon officials saying they will seek the death penalty should the suspects be convicted. Among the six is Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, suspected mastermind of the 9/11 attacks. Brigadier General Thomas Hartmann, legal adviser to the U.S. military-tribunal system, said of the 169 charges to be brought against the suspects, “These charges allege a long-term, highly sophisticated, organized plan by al-Qa’ida to attack the United States of America.” The other five jihadis include Mohammed al-Qahtani, the alleged 20th hijacker; Ramzi Binalshibh, liaison between the hijackers and al-Qa’ida; Ali Abd al-Aziz Ali (a.k.a. Ammar al-Baluchi), a nephew of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and lieutenant for operations; Mustafa Ahmad al-Hawsawi, one of al-Baluchi’s assistants; and Waleed bin Attash, who selected and trained some of the 9/11 hijackers. Needless to say, they are as fine a group as any to kick off the first capital trial under the military’s tribunal system.

Of course, the usual cadre of leftists, pacifists and dimwits (but we repeat ourselves) started howling that the indicted jihadis had been tortured and denied due process. We are not entirely clear on how making the Pentagon jump though years of legal hoops and modify its tribunal rules is not due process. As for torture, waterboarding may or may not be torture, but that has no bearing on the jihadis’ involvement in 9/11. We may soon see the Jihadi 6 sent to meet their 72 virgins.

Last week, we reported that the city of Berkeley, California, had resolved that the United States Marine Corps was not welcome to continue recruiting there. If they continued, it would be as “uninvited and unwelcome intruders.” It seems that news raised the ire of many a patriotic American, forcing the city council to reconsider—now they will not send their hateful letter to the USMC. Not only that, but they issued a statement saying they “deeply respect and support” the men and women who serve in the U.S. Armed Forces. Something makes us doubt their sincerity. Maybe it’s the fact that the angry anti-war group Code Pink still has a special parking space reserved outside the recruiting office.

In Congress, Rep. John Campbell (R-CA) and Sen. Jim DeMint (R-SC) responded by introducing the Semper Fi Act, which would strip Berkeley of all federal earmarks for fiscal year 2008, instead giving the money to the United States Marines for recruiting.

Apparently, the mayor of Toledo, Ohio, hadn’t seen this news as he ordered 200 members of Company A, 1st Battalion, 24th Marines to turn around and leave rather than engage in urban-patrol exercises in the downtown area. Despite the fact that Toledo police knew about the exercise days in advance and the Marines have held exercises there before, Mayor Carty Finkbeiner (yes, that’s his real name) “asked them to leave because they frighten people,” according to a spokesman. “I wish they would have told us this four hours ago,” Staff Sgt. Andre Davis said. Indeed, the aborted exercise—busing the Marines from Grand Rapids, Michigan—cost roughly $10,000.

Ohrah!

Shock Doctrine: Part I « Publius2012’s Weblog

February 15, 2008

Shock Doctrine: Part I « Publius2012’s Weblog

This seems to be an exercise in historical rhetoric. Often using two unrelated things to hitch a point together somewhere else. Example: Noting that the actions of the C.I.A. went against the U.C.M.J. (Publius called it the “army’s” when in fact it governs all the services.) The C.I.A. is not a part of the military, sorry about that.

Then he calls out the Chicago School of Economics for abuses that were carried out in Brazil..? If he actualy knew anything about what is taught in Social Economics he would know better than to spout such nonsense.

He speaks about American mining operations in South America as if the businesses did nothing for the local population. Schools must not matter, nor fresh running water and sewer systems. Just to name a few.

Utopia will never happen, period. Free Markets do however offer the best hope for mankind to get near that state.

AFGHANISTAN GENOCIDE EXPOSED « A Soldier’s Heart

February 9, 2008

AFGHANISTAN GENOCIDE EXPOSED « A Soldier’s Heart

Can you say “propaganda?” I knew ya could!

Why is West after Pakistan’s nukes?

February 3, 2008

source: http://rupeenews.com/2008/02/03/why-is-west-after-pakistan%e2%80%99s-nukes-by-maftab/

You will have to read this entire story to fully understand the obvious hatred that this man has for western society, and the United States in particular. Well Mister Aftab, get a clue:

  1. Those “innocent” Japanese were actively supporting mass killings all across Asia.
  2. We do have people on the ground in Pakistan, and there is the very real possibility of a Tali ban style regime taking over the nation.
  3. Israel exists, get used to it. Hit them with nuclear weapons expect retaliation.
  4. Israel has not threatened anyone with annihilation. Muslim nations have threatened Israel, and the United States with annihilation on many occasions.
  5. What the hell would we, as in the USA, want your countries weapons for? We have plenty of our own.

Musharraf: Keep U.S. troops out of Pakistan

January 12, 2008

The Pakastani strong man appears to be grasping at straws to maintain any popular support for his continued existence in this world.

ISLAMABAD, Pakistan – Despite the growing threat from Islamic extremists, President Pervez Musharraf said U.S. troops are not welcome to join the fight against al-Qaida on Pakistani soil.

Musharraf warned in an interview published Friday that Pakistan would resist any unilateral military action by the United States against militants sheltering in its lawless, tribal regions close to the Afghan border.

“I challenge anybody coming into our mountains,” he told Singapore’s The Straits Times in the interview, notable for its unusually strident language. “They would regret that day.”

source: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22613874/

Get a clue fearless leader. Without western support, you are just another piece of infidel meat. Your nation is factionalized beyond belief, and that’s not even counting the Tali-ban / al Qaeda coalition that want your head on a stick. You should be begging for American and British Empire Special Forces to come to Pakistan, and do what they do best. Personally, I hope that they do stay out of your hell hole, at least until you have been removed from the Chessboard of life. After that? Then they will have no reason at all not to hunt down the terrorist’s.

HOW TO CATCH WILD PIGS « D=S

January 12, 2008

HOW TO CATCH WILD PIGS « D=S

I stumbled across this while web surfing today. It is a take off from something that I was told as a child and the message is still important today, if not more so. All to often, men simply act in what they perceive to be in their best interest for the moment. Never bothering to look past what is directly in front of their noses.

Now, one might believe that this is simply a function of youth and inexperience. If that were so then people like John McCain and Fred Thompson wouldn’t say or do some of the stupid things that they do. Rather, they are the ones that are subtly building the fence.

Deadly silliness

January 10, 2008

Sometimes I simply must wonder what on earth the Democrats have in their collective heads, or lack thereof. It appears that they would rather complain about corporate profits than address issues of national security. 

“If the New Hampshire debates settled anything, it’s which party has the stomach to take on radical Islam. The Democrats couldn’t even identify the enemy. Not once. Really. We scanned the transcripts of Saturday’s debates hosted by ABC News and tallied up the references to Islamic terrorism. The rhetorical divide between Democrats and Republicans on that score alone—ignoring the yawning gaps in policy—is stunning. None of the four Democrat presidential candidates—despite running for an office that demands they lead the ongoing global war against Islamic extremists—could bring himself or herself to define the enemy we face as Islamic. Their combined references to ‘Islam’ or ‘Islamic’ totaled zero—even though moderator Charles Gibson prompted them with a question about ‘Islamic radicals’ threatening the U.S. with nuclear terrorism. But Democrats refused to go there. Out of respect for their constituency, there was a complete blackout regarding Islamic jihad… Republicans, on the other hand, called the enemy by its proper name. The candidates referred to terrorists and terrorism as ‘Islamic,’ while also citing radical ‘Islam’ as the problem, no less than 22 times… They get it. Democrats don’t. They talked a lot about ‘fighting’ —fighting insurance companies and big business and Wall Street and polluters. But will they fight the real enemy—Islamic terrorists?… These contrasting performances in New Hampshire should crystallize in voters’ minds more than any other recent example how one party understands the titanic challenge we face from radical Islam, while the other decidedly does not.” —Investor’s Business Daily