CHILD SOLDIERS – Slavery of the Worst Kind – Part 3 of 4 « AfricaRights
I would urge all of my readers to follow the link and read the entire piece. From the Matabele’ to the Viet Cong ad-nauseaum forced recruitment of children has been going on seemingly forever all over the world. Why is it that the people that engage in this sort of thing are always despots?
Achmed the Dead Terrorist – Jingle Bombs « Liberty Just in Case#comment-7516#comment-7516
Good evening infadel…
From sound bites on the Gunny Bob show to clubs across the face of the earth. One only wonders how long it will be until a fatwa is issued…
Edward’s Evil Insurance Scam « Liberty Just in Case
Edwards is not just another run of the mill big government politician. He is downright dangerous. Take a look at his proposals and it all becomes clear as a bell.
Sometimes I simply must wonder what on earth the Democrats have in their collective heads, or lack thereof. It appears that they would rather complain about corporate profits than address issues of national security.
“If the New Hampshire debates settled anything, it’s which party has the stomach to take on radical Islam. The Democrats couldn’t even identify the enemy. Not once. Really. We scanned the transcripts of Saturday’s debates hosted by ABC News and tallied up the references to Islamic terrorism. The rhetorical divide between Democrats and Republicans on that score alone—ignoring the yawning gaps in policy—is stunning. None of the four Democrat presidential candidates—despite running for an office that demands they lead the ongoing global war against Islamic extremists—could bring himself or herself to define the enemy we face as Islamic. Their combined references to ‘Islam’ or ‘Islamic’ totaled zero—even though moderator Charles Gibson prompted them with a question about ‘Islamic radicals’ threatening the U.S. with nuclear terrorism. But Democrats refused to go there. Out of respect for their constituency, there was a complete blackout regarding Islamic jihad… Republicans, on the other hand, called the enemy by its proper name. The candidates referred to terrorists and terrorism as ‘Islamic,’ while also citing radical ‘Islam’ as the problem, no less than 22 times… They get it. Democrats don’t. They talked a lot about ‘fighting’ —fighting insurance companies and big business and Wall Street and polluters. But will they fight the real enemy—Islamic terrorists?… These contrasting performances in New Hampshire should crystallize in voters’ minds more than any other recent example how one party understands the titanic challenge we face from radical Islam, while the other decidedly does not.” —Investor’s Business Daily
 | Patrick Sperry on On Not so civil wars… |
 | TexasFred on Guest commentary… |
 | MaddMedic on Guest commentary… |
| Patrick Sperry on The Stupid runs deep… |
| Patrick Sperry on Math for planning in the comin… |
Conservative Libertarian Outpost 