Archive for the ‘Local Politics Colorado’ Category

Barak Obama! Man for America..?

October 3, 2007

As always, do your own research. I say that because there is so much misinformation floating around. From the NRA being blamed for school shootings, to rumors of Hilary Clinton’s homosexuality, mystery abounds in this information age! I recieved this, did my own research, and found it to be sound, or at least as sound as one can do from a distance.

I got this from a life long friend and I am passing it along to you because I KNOW that he does his research… Fred

 Subject: Muslim in the White House?

 Friends and relatives:
Thought you might find this interesting, so I ‘snops’ed it and 
‘googled’ it.  The results scared the
heck out of me.Pure facts:

Who is Barack Obama?

Probable U. S.presidential candidate, Barack Hussein Obama was born
in Honolulu, Hawaii, to Barack Hussein Obama, Sr., a Black Muslim
from Nyangoma-Kogel, Kenya and Ann Dunham, a white ATHIEST from
Wichita,Kansas.

Obama’s parents met at the University of Hawaii
When Obama was two years old, his parents divorced. His father
returned to Kenya.

 His mother then married Lolo Soetoro, a RADICAL Muslim From
Indonesia. When Obama was 6 years old, the family relocated to Indonesia.
Obama attended a MUSLIM school in Jakarta. He also spent two years
in a  Catholic school.
 
Obama takes great care to conceal the fact that he is a Muslim. He
Is quick to point out that, “He was once a Muslim, but that he also
attended Catholic school.”

Obama’s political handlers are attempting to make it appear that
Obama’s introduction to Islam came via his father, and that this
influence was temporary at best. In reality, the senior Obama
returned to Kenya soon after the divorce, and never again had any direct
influence  over his  son’s education.

Lolo Soetoro, the second husband of Obama’s mother, Ann Dunham, 
introduced his stepson to Islam.
Obama was enrolled in a Wahabi school in
Jakarta.
 Wahabism is the RADICAL teaching that is followed by the Muslim 
terrorists  who are now waging Jihad against the western world
.
 
Since it is politically expedient to be a CHRISTIAN when seeking
Major  public office in the United States, Barack Hussein Obama has joined
the United Church of Christ in an attempt to downplay his Muslim 
background.
Let us all remain alert concerning Obama’s expected presidential candidacy.   The Muslims have said they plan on destroying the US from the inside out, what better way to start than at the highest level?
 

Please forward to everyone you know.

http://TexasFred.net/

Now, after all of that, ask yourselves, why would this man want America disarmed? His maniacal stance on gun control is, I believe an indicator of ulterior motives. Why would this man want Rush Limbaugh, and others muzzled? Again, I suspect ulterior motives. Why, I ask, is he apparently hell bent on income redistribution? Yet again, I suspect ulterior motives.

Personal weaponry, freedom of speech, and a relatively free economic system are all essentials to maintaining a free America.

Dem Rep To Introduce House Resolution Condemning Rush Limbaugh On Monday « Living Politics

September 30, 2007

Dem Rep To Introduce House Resolution Condemning Rush Limbaugh On Monday « Living Politics

It just so happens that I was listening to Rush that day when the commentary was made. Nothing that he said was out of line, thank you. I also see mark on occasion, and will let him know that he is making, or by then will have made one heck of a mistake. Further, I will do it publicly, right up front, and personal.

The United Nations are again seeking to undermine our Constitution

September 30, 2007

U.N. Members, Gun Lobby Face Arms Fight

September 30th, 2007

UNITED NATIONS (AP) – Britain, Japan, Australia and others are pushing for an unprecedented treaty regulating the arms trade worldwide, in a campaign sure to last years and to pit them against a determined American foe, the National Rifle Association.In what U.N. officials say is an “overwhelming” response, almost 100 governments have submitted ideas for such a treaty, to be reviewed over the next year. There’s an “extremely urgent” need for controls on the international gun trade, says Kenya, echoing the sentiment in much of guns-besieged Africa.

But in the U.S., the NRA says it sees a creeping attempt to limit civilian gun ownership within nations – even though the focus now is on setting standards for arms exports and imports.

The international issues “necessarily will come to involve at some point domestic laws and policies regarding firearms,” said former congressman Bob Barr, a leading NRA voice on the subject.

“That’s not what we’re looking at here,” countered Greg Puley, of the Control Arms coalition of pro-treaty advocacy groups. “The point is to control trade in weapons that contribute to conflict and atrocities.”

The NRA and other U.S. gun lobbyists have helped blunt earlier efforts at the United Nations to rein in the weapons trade. Last December, the U.S. delegation cast the lone negative vote when 153 nations approved a General Assembly resolution initiating this new treaty process.

Full Story Here:
U.N. Members, Gun Lobby Face Arms Fight

source:http://texasfred.net/archives/586/trackback/

This is yet again another attempt, in the long run, to undermine the Constitution of the United States. They (elements of authoritarianism within the U.N.) continue to attempt to weaken, and destroy freedom and liberty across the entire globe. So what? It’s only guns…. Well people it’s time to wake up. What will it be next? Your right to spew forth whatever you care to say? Or, it could be any of the other rights that are found in the documents that are the foundations of the United States of America?  Those rights are all needed in place, for one supports the other, and so on. Chip away, or remove any of them and the entire ideology that they support will come apart.

Home Grown Hate mongers in the media

September 30, 2007

The enemy is among us, and in positions of power. Here is a short list, supplied by the team over at Gunny Bob’s on KOA 850 radio. source: http://www.850koa.com/pages/shows_gunny-extremists.html

DENVER MEDIA EXTREMIST AND PROPAGANDIST WATCH

A Service Of The Gunny Bob Freedom Defense Team
In this section of the Gunny Bob Show website, audience members are kept informed on radical merchants of hatred, bigotry and intolerance in the Colorado media who seek to harm America and the freedoms guaranteed to us by the Constitution. It is updated regularly. Audience members may submit material for consideration by emailing the Gunny at gunnybob@850koa.com.


2720575

  • PAUL CAMPOS

    Affiliations: Rocky Mountain News opinion columnist, “professor” at the University of Colorado at Boulder

    Campos claims conservatives have deep desire for war, bloodshed, carnage and death; suggests those killed by US forces in the war on terror are simply “hapless foreigners”:

    http://www.rockymountainnews.com/drmn/opinion_columnists/
    article/0,2777,DRMN_23972_5706252,00.html

  • MIKE LITTWIN

    Affiliations: Rocky Mountain News “news” columnist, International Society of Bad Barber Victims

    Littwin defends profane, immature CSU editor; claims scandal is a free-speech issue:

    http://www.rockymountainnews.com/drmn/news_columnists/
    article/0,1299,DRMN_86_5708487,00.html

  • DIANE CARMAN

    Affiliations: Denver Post “news” columnist

    Carman implies anyone who wears a cowboy hat and wants illegal aliens held accountable for their crimes is a racist:

    http://www.denverpost.com/newscolumnists/ci_6942264

  • ROCKY MOUNTAIN NEWS EDITORIAL BOARD

    Affiliations: Rocky Mountain News RMN: “In principle, there’s nothing wrong with the president of Iran laying a wreath at the World Trade Center site . . . “

  • DENVER POST EDITORIAL BOARD

    Affiliations: Denver Post DP: Evil U.S. conservative government employees might be knowingly and intentionally spying on totally innocent liberal Americans for nefarious purposes:

    http://www.denverpost.com/editorials/ci_6962777

  • PETTY OFFICER 2ND CLASS CHARLES LUKE “DOC” MILAM, UNITED STATES NAVY

    September 30, 2007

    PETTY OFFICER 2ND CLASS CHARLES LUKE “DOC” MILAM, UNITED STATES NAVY

    2nd Marine Special Operations Battalion, Afghanistan

    As you read this, Doc is on patrol along the streets of Heaven, caring for his beloved Marines.

    Doc Milam, from Littleton, was killed in action fighting terrorists in Afghanistan. He won the Bronze Star for valor and the Purple Heart.

    Fair winds and following seas, Doc.

     

    Is it just my imagination, or has Littleton Colorado supplied hero’s for America far out of proportion to the towns size?

    The Bellyaches of Free Speech

    September 30, 2007

    The University of Colorado is yet again in the news in a most negative manner this week. Our friends over at the Independence Institute sum the situation up nicely for us.

    The Bellyaches of Free Speech

    By Jessica Corry & Ryan Olivett

    Sept. 26th 2007
    Free speech to a college newspaper editor is like an endless supply of candy to a five-year-old. Too often, both will partake of the sweets now and pay the consequences later.It’s a lesson Colorado State University officials are reminded of this week as they deal with the public furor erupting after staff at the school’s student newspaper, the Rocky Mountain Collegian, let their thoughts concerning President Bush and the state of American civil liberties be known on the editorial page.

    Specifically, the paper’s September 21st editorial page contained a four word editorial. “Taser this. . . F*$% Bush,” it read.

    Collegian Editor David McSwane and his board say they intended to ignite debate about free speech. “We thought the best way to illustrate that point was to use our freedoms,” McSwane said. In other words, they saw shock treatment as their best possible approach. How sad.

    In reality, there are plenty of other means to discuss free speech. But, McSwane and the Collegian chose an immature and irresponsible way to get attention–the candy they crave. They also assumed their readers weren’t sophisticated enough to engage in a legitimate dialogue on a very important political issue.

    Like a child howling in a candy store to get what he wants, the Collegian substituted a four letter word for genuine political discourse. All for attention. If only McSwane had stepped back for a moment to acknowledge not just his freedoms as an American–but also his ethical obligations as a newspaper editor.

    According to the code of ethics espoused by the Society of Professional Journalists, “gathering and reporting information may cause harm or discomfort,” but this doesn’t mean the “pursuit of the news (serves as) a license for arrogance.” Journalists are, therefore, advised to “show good taste.” By printing their juvenile editorial, McSwane and his staff irresponsibly violated this ethos.

    As McSwane is learning all too well, the First Amendment grants impunity from unnecessary government suppression–not impunity from public scrutiny. He is also getting an important lesson in basic market economics. While university officials should resist booting him for his choice of words, community members should be free to respond with their wallets. Advertisers have already yanked more than $30,000 in revenue.

    The pain from lost advertisements is just the beginning. As CSU officials contemplate Swane’s fate, his journalistic reputation is now being solidified as someone unable to make important but basic ethical distinctions in everyday editorial decisions. This reputation is bound to follow him to his next journalist position–if there is to be one. Most professional journalists understand that obscene words don’t amount to quality journalism.

    Ultimately, the CSU newspaper staff got what it wanted–attention. It’s just too bad that the paper’s editors will likely realize too late that this is just the type of attention a journalist should never seek. Free speech is sacred. We don’t need to scream obscenities to prove it.

    Summary: “Free speech to a college newspaper editor is like an endless supply of candy to a five-year-old”

    Word Count: 917 _____

    If you experience problems viewing this op-ed, you can find the op-ed on-line at: The Independence Institute

    ________________

    (c) 2007
    The Independence Institute
    13952 Denver West Parkway, Suite 400
    Golden, CO 80401
    303-279-6536
    www.independenceinstitute.org


    INDEPENDENCE INSTITUTE is a non-profit, non-partisan Colorado think tank. It is governed by a statewide board of trustees and holds a 501(c)(3) tax exemption from the IRS. Its public policy research focuses on economic growth, education reform, local government effectiveness, and Constitutional rights.

    Jon Caldara is the President of the Independence Institute.

    Great new blog!

    September 25, 2007

    http://endthewaronguns.blogspot.com

    Stop by and give him a few hits!

    My New Truck (humor)

    September 25, 2007

    I bought a new Ford F-150 4 door with a short bed and
    landau top and returned to the dealer the next day
    because I couldn’t get the radio to work. The salesman
    explained that the radio was voice activated.

    “Nelson,” the salesman said to the radio. The Radio
    replied, “Ricky or Willie?”  “Willie!” he continued
    and

    “On The Road Again” came from the speakers.  Then he
    said, “Ray Charles!”, and in an instant ” Georgia

    On My Mind”  replaced Willie Nelson

    I drove away happy, and for the next few days, every
    time I’d say, “Beethoven,” I’d get beautiful classical

    music, and if I said, “Beatles,”  I’d get one of their
    awesome songs.

    Yesterday, a couple ran a red light and nearly creamed
    my new truck, but I swerved in time to avoid them.

    I yelled, ” GD Ass Holes!”  Immediately the French
    National Anthem began to play, sung by Jane Fonda

    and Barbara Streisand, backed up by Michael Moore and
    The Dixie Chicks,  with John Kerry on guitar,

    Al Gore on drums, Dan Rather on harmonica, Ted Kennedy
    on scotch.

    Damn, I LOVE this TRUCK!!!

    From the one, and only Mister Christer!

    Senator Dianne Feinstein Is At It Again!

    September 22, 2007

    Anti-gun California Senator Dianne Feinstein Is At It Again!

    Gun Owners of America E-Mail Alert
    8001 Forbes Place, Suite 102, Springfield, VA 22151
    Phone: 703-321-8585 / FAX: 703-321-8408
    http://www.gunowners.org

    Monday, September 17, 2007

    You may recall that in recent years, GOA has enlisted your aid in
    fighting so-called “gang” legislation, which typically includes
    attempts to apply federal RICO anti-racketeering statutes to minor
    gun infractions — thus harassing and prosecuting otherwise
    law-abiding gun owners as though they were Mafia bosses.

    Well, Feinstein’s S. 456 is the latest vehicle for such
    underhandedness.

    At issue is section 215 of the bill. In essence, your family, gun
    shop employees, or even church bowling league would be considered an
    organized “gang” and subjected to draconian prison sentences if you
    did any of a number of things, such as:

    * having a gun (loaded OR unloaded) in your glovebox as you —
    inevitably — drive within 1,000 feet of a school, even if you didn’t
    know the school was there;

    * selling a gun out of your store while being entrapped in a
    Bloomberg-style “sting” operation;

    * teaching your son to shoot without giving him a written letter of
    permission (which must be on his actual person), even if you are
    standing right behind him at the range the whole time; or,

    * simply being one the 83,000 veterans whose names were illegally
    added to the Brady system by President Clinton (or, presumably, one
    of the thousands more who will be on the list if the current Veterans
    Disarmament bill passes), if you continued to possess a firearm.

    Now, there’s a lot of legal verbiage in S. 456, which is quite large
    as bills go. Feinstein and her anti-gun cronies will counter that the
    situations listed above aren’t enough — you also have to commit a
    crime of violence while engaging in them.

    Oh yeah? Consider how many people defending themselves from
    carjackers or their businesses from hold-ups are indicted by anti-gun
    prosecutors merely for exercising their right to self-defense. And
    what judge is going to say that the “gun crimes” in those instances
    aren’t crimes of violence?

    Further, any anti-gun prosecutor could simply state that family
    members or gun shop employees are “co-conspirators” or are
    “aiding
    and abetting” actual criminals using guns.

    And of course, we have had plenty of warning of what happens when
    prosecutorial powers are enormously expanded. Take the original RICO
    Act itself, for example. We were told that it was needed to shut down
    the Mafia — a tool to be used in the fight against organized crime.
    But in the years since its passage, the RICO Act has become the
    overzealous prosecutor’s version of going nuclear… wrapping
    everything up in one big package of conspiracy charges and twenty
    years to life prison terms.

    It just isn’t right that you, your spouse, and your two teenage boys
    could be treated like the Gambino family just because you brandished
    your firearm to scare away a carjacker… without firing a shot! And
    prison terms of 10, 20, or even all of your remaining years aren’t
    right in such instances, either!

    In short, section 215 of S. 456 is unacceptable. It must be deleted,
    period. To our knowledge, the entire Second Amendment community —
    spearheaded by GOA and the NRA — is adamantly opposed to Feinstein’s
    scheme.

    It should be noted that there is lots of talk on Capitol Hill about
    how to “handle” the problems of S. 456 with a minimum of fuss. The
    most likely scenario is that there would only be two amendments
    allowed — one Republican and one Democratic. Once that is done, the
    Senate would immediately proceed to a vote on the bill… which may
    or may not be a recorded vote. Gun owners should bear in mind that,
    regardless of which politician is saying otherwise, there is NO
    GUARANTEE that the Republican amendment would even attempt to totally
    strike section 215. The amendment might not help matters that much,
    and might not pass anyway.

    So this attempt to placate gun owners with a “roll of the dice”
    amendment vote is nothing more than the usual smoke-and-mirrors
    designed to give politicians cover from the wrath of a known activist
    constituency.

    GOA doesn’t believe in gambling with your rights. Our position is
    firm and unalterable: section 215 must go away, now. The time to kill
    a snake is before it strikes. And this snake could strike at any
    time; a vote on final passage could occur as early as this week.

    So here’s what you can do to help kill the snake. Any individual
    senator can place a “hold” on a particular piece of
    legislation until
    his or her concerns are addressed; if the Leadership ignores those
    objections, it becomes extremely difficult to move the legislation
    forward. The “hold” is a legislative tactic that we have used to
    great advantage in the past. We need at least one Senator to take
    that step and place a hold on S. 456.

    ACTION:

    Please contact your Senators right away and ask them to place a
    “hold” on S. 456 until such time as section 215 is deleted from the
    bill. You can use the Gun Owners Legislative Action Center at
    http://www.gunowners.org/activism.htm to send your Senators a
    pre-written message by e-mail requesting they do so.

    RINO’s seek to sway gun owners

    September 22, 2007

    see: http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&sid=aPjjVHHFo_rY&refer=us

    Then see: http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/09/19/giuliani-to-face-the-nra/

    Face it folks, once again we will be picking the lessor of the evils in this election for President. Some think that Fred Thompson is the dream candidate. But, after a close look at his past voting record I hardly believe that he is anything but a Constitutional Conservative.