Archive for the ‘Men’s Issues’ Category

Hilarious Hillary Poem: First Three Chapters « Jabberwocky

February 17, 2008

Hilarious Hillary Poem: First Three Chapters « Jabberwocky
OUTSTANDING!

This is great stuff! Go there!

Can we get a libertarian for Obama? « Bricks

February 17, 2008

Can we get a libertarian for Obama? « Bricks
Obama is anti Second Amendment.
Obama thinks he can talk our way out of terrorism.
Has Obama seen a tax that he didn’t like?
Obama attends a racist church.
This Conservative Libertarian refuses to vote for anyone like that.

Profiles of valor: USAF Tech. Sgt. Chapman

February 15, 2008

United States Air Force Tech. Sgt. John Chapman, from Fayetteville, North Carolina, was involved in a reconnaissance mission in northern Afghanistan on 4 March 2002 when the team’s twin-engine Chinook helicopter came under heavy fire. It was hit by a rocket-propelled grenade and crash-landed. Chapman called in air support to cover the team, which was now exposed to enemy fire. He also directed a helicopter rescue of his team and aircrew members and led the search for a Navy SEAL who had fallen from the helicopter. Chapman killed two jihadis during the search, but came upon a machine-gun nest. Though the enemy fired on the rescue team on three sides, Chapman fired back. Soon, however, multiple wounds claimed his life, though he is credited with saving the lives of the others in the rescue team. For his actions, Chapman was posthumously awarded the Air Force Cross, and a U.S. Navy cargo ship was named in his honor.

Source: Patriot Post

Warfront with Jihadistan: Justice served

February 15, 2008

From: The Patriot Post

“You can run, but you can’t hide.” So said President Ronald Reagan to terrorists nearly 20 years ago. This week, one jihadi who had been running was finally found, and let’s just say he won’t be in the terror business anymore. Senior Hizballah planner and operative Imad Mugniyah, wanted for more than 25 years, was killed Tuesday in Damascus by a car bomb, a fitting end for the man who pioneered vehicle bombings as an act of terror. Mugniyah was behind some of the most significant acts of terrorist violence ever perpetrated against Americans, including the 1983 bombings of the U.S. Embassy and the U.S. Marine barracks in Beirut, and the 1985 murder of U.S. Navy diver Robert Stethem during an airline hijacking. However, he had virtually disappeared since the early 1990s. Syrian, Iranian and Hizballah spokesmen immediately blamed Israel and the United States for the car bomb, a charge Israel promptly denied. The authors of this bombing will likely never be known, but the end result is the same: justice served at long last to a terrorist with the blood of hundreds on his hands.

Turning to the ongoing terrorist threat, two documents recently recovered by U.S. forces in Iraq offer insight into the current state of mind of al-Qa’ida in Iraq: gloom and doom. Citing the sweeping changes that have taken place since the U.S. troop surge began, one captured document’s author laments, “[T]he Islamic State of Iraq is faced with an extraordinary crisis, especially in al-Anbar.” Patriot readers will no doubt remember that just 18 months ago the Marines’ top intelligence officer judged that “there is almost nothing the U.S. military can do to improve the political and social situation [in Anbar].” While these documents represent the views of only two individuals, the enemy’s own words are the clearest possible indication of what effect the surge and the Sunni Awakening have had in Iraq, no matter how many times Harry Reid (D-nial) and Nancy Pelosi (D-featist) tell us it isn’t so.

“The gains [in Iraq] have not produced the desired effect, which is the reconciliation of Iraq. This is a failure. This is a failure! The troops have succeeded. God bless them. We owe them the greatest debt of gratitude, the sacrifice, their patriotism, and for their courage, and to their families as well. This is a disaster, and we cannot perpetuate it.” —House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, who, uh, supports the troops, God bless them!

Finally, justice for 9/11 may be served. On Monday, the Pentagon formally charged six jihadi suspects held at Guantanamo Bay with murder and war crimes related to the September 11th attacks, with Pentagon officials saying they will seek the death penalty should the suspects be convicted. Among the six is Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, suspected mastermind of the 9/11 attacks. Brigadier General Thomas Hartmann, legal adviser to the U.S. military-tribunal system, said of the 169 charges to be brought against the suspects, “These charges allege a long-term, highly sophisticated, organized plan by al-Qa’ida to attack the United States of America.” The other five jihadis include Mohammed al-Qahtani, the alleged 20th hijacker; Ramzi Binalshibh, liaison between the hijackers and al-Qa’ida; Ali Abd al-Aziz Ali (a.k.a. Ammar al-Baluchi), a nephew of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and lieutenant for operations; Mustafa Ahmad al-Hawsawi, one of al-Baluchi’s assistants; and Waleed bin Attash, who selected and trained some of the 9/11 hijackers. Needless to say, they are as fine a group as any to kick off the first capital trial under the military’s tribunal system.

Of course, the usual cadre of leftists, pacifists and dimwits (but we repeat ourselves) started howling that the indicted jihadis had been tortured and denied due process. We are not entirely clear on how making the Pentagon jump though years of legal hoops and modify its tribunal rules is not due process. As for torture, waterboarding may or may not be torture, but that has no bearing on the jihadis’ involvement in 9/11. We may soon see the Jihadi 6 sent to meet their 72 virgins.

Last week, we reported that the city of Berkeley, California, had resolved that the United States Marine Corps was not welcome to continue recruiting there. If they continued, it would be as “uninvited and unwelcome intruders.” It seems that news raised the ire of many a patriotic American, forcing the city council to reconsider—now they will not send their hateful letter to the USMC. Not only that, but they issued a statement saying they “deeply respect and support” the men and women who serve in the U.S. Armed Forces. Something makes us doubt their sincerity. Maybe it’s the fact that the angry anti-war group Code Pink still has a special parking space reserved outside the recruiting office.

In Congress, Rep. John Campbell (R-CA) and Sen. Jim DeMint (R-SC) responded by introducing the Semper Fi Act, which would strip Berkeley of all federal earmarks for fiscal year 2008, instead giving the money to the United States Marines for recruiting.

Apparently, the mayor of Toledo, Ohio, hadn’t seen this news as he ordered 200 members of Company A, 1st Battalion, 24th Marines to turn around and leave rather than engage in urban-patrol exercises in the downtown area. Despite the fact that Toledo police knew about the exercise days in advance and the Marines have held exercises there before, Mayor Carty Finkbeiner (yes, that’s his real name) “asked them to leave because they frighten people,” according to a spokesman. “I wish they would have told us this four hours ago,” Staff Sgt. Andre Davis said. Indeed, the aborted exercise—busing the Marines from Grand Rapids, Michigan—cost roughly $10,000.

Ohrah!

Shock Doctrine: Part I « Publius2012’s Weblog

February 15, 2008

Shock Doctrine: Part I « Publius2012’s Weblog

This seems to be an exercise in historical rhetoric. Often using two unrelated things to hitch a point together somewhere else. Example: Noting that the actions of the C.I.A. went against the U.C.M.J. (Publius called it the “army’s” when in fact it governs all the services.) The C.I.A. is not a part of the military, sorry about that.

Then he calls out the Chicago School of Economics for abuses that were carried out in Brazil..? If he actualy knew anything about what is taught in Social Economics he would know better than to spout such nonsense.

He speaks about American mining operations in South America as if the businesses did nothing for the local population. Schools must not matter, nor fresh running water and sewer systems. Just to name a few.

Utopia will never happen, period. Free Markets do however offer the best hope for mankind to get near that state.

GOA Files Blockbuster Brief

February 14, 2008

GOA Files Blockbuster Brief Before The U.S. Supreme Court!– Pratt hits the airwaves, selling the pro-gun position in the courtof public opinion Gun Owners of America E-Mail Alert8001 Forbes Place, Suite 102, Springfield, VA 22151Phone: 703-321-8585 / FAX: 703-321-8408http://www.gunowners.org Tuesday, February 12, 2008 Gun Owners of America filed its brief yesterday before the U.S.Supreme Court in defense of Dick Anthony Heller, who was denied theright to own a gun in the nation’s capital as a result of thedraconian gun ban which exists there. In this hard-hitting brief, GOA takes aim at the weak arguments putforth by both the DC government and the Bush Administration. Butmore than that, GOA examines the favorable text and context of theSecond Amendment in great detail, while also documenting the pro-gunhistory that formed the backdrop of its inclusion into the Bill ofRights. The GOA brief even presents the greatest reason for the right to keepand bear arms, stating that “the Second Amendment right is to beexercised as a last resort to guard against tyranny.” GOA’s Executive Director, Larry Pratt, has hit the airwaves recently,appearing on many talk shows and in newspapers to differentiate theGOA approach from the sullied road the President has taken. Pratt,along with other GOA spokesmen, has argued that the “bomb” whichBush’s Solicitor General dropped last month (when he submitted hisbrief) would destroy the Second Amendment.
After all, the Bush administration’s approach is that any and allguns can be controlled or banned if a federal court finds that to be”reasonable.” The GOA approach differs from many of the briefs that are beingsubmitted to the high Court. For example, one brief which is beingsubmitted by several legislators highlights Congress’ position on theSecond Amendment over the years. This can be a useful approach, tobe sure. But while the congressional brief concedes that the DC Council mayhave gone too far, it also says it’s appropriate for the legislativebranch to pass restrictions upon our Second Amendment rights — astance which is, in principle, not too different from the one theU.S. Solicitor General has filed. That’s where the GOA brief draws a “bright line” in the sand byrepeating the amendment’s wording “shall not be infringed” over andover again. For example, our brief states: [T]he argument that “the right of the people” is subject to reasonable regulation and restriction tramples on the very words of the Second Amendment, reading the phrase — “shall not be infringed” — as if it read “shall be subject only to reasonable regulation to achieve public safety.” The GOA brief can be read online athttp://www.gunowners.org/fs0802.pdf on the GOA website. Severalpro-gun groups joined GOA, including Gun Owners Foundation, GunOwners of California, Maryland Shall Issue, Inc., Virginia CitizensDefense League, among others.
You will remember that last month, GOA alerted you to Rep. VirgilGoode’s efforts to get President Bush to pull his brief before theCourt. Thanks to your efforts, Rep. Goode has almost 50congressional signatories on his letter. While the letter hasalready been sent to the President, Goode continues to solicit evenmore signatories and is sending those names to Bush as well. (GOAwill provide you further updates and a list of the congressman whohave cosigned the letter in an upcoming alert.) Gun Owners of America is committing a significant portion of ouravailable resources as we are fighting this battle in the courts, inthe Congress and in the media. If you would like to help do your part in covering the tremendouscosts associated with this effort, please go tohttp://www.gunowners.com/heller.htm to make a tax-deductiblecontribution. Thank you so much.

Vice President Cheney Signs On

February 14, 2008

Vice President Cheney Signs On
To Congressional Amicus Curiae Brief:
Affirms Unequivocal Support Of Second
Amendment As An Individual Right

Today, in his capacity as President of the United States Senate, Vice President Cheney signed on to the congressional amicus curiae brief affirming the individual rights view of the Second Amendment. As Americans, we are grateful and fortunate to have a friend of freedom in the Vice President.

NRA And U.S. Lawmakers Join D.C. V. Heller Plaintiffs In Filing Briefs With U.S. Supreme Court: On Thursday, February 7, NRA and the NRA Civil Rights Defense Fund submitted an amicus curiae brief to the United States Supreme Court in the case of District of Columbia v. Heller. This “friend of the court” brief supports a lower federal appeals court decision holding that the Second Amendment protects an individual right to keep and bear arms, and asserts that the D.C. bans on handguns, on carrying firearms within the home, and on possession of loaded or operable firearms for self-defense violate that fundamental right.

Colorado Political Scene

February 14, 2008

COLORADO: Update on Pending Firearm Legislation On Wednesday, February 6 the House Judiciary Committee voted 5 to 4 to defeat House Bill 1066, sponsored by State Representative Cory Gardner (R-63). This “Castle Doctrine” legislation would have extended self-defense protections beyond the home to include businesses. In spite of this unfortunate loss, three anti-freedom bills were also defeated in the Colorado legislature this week thanks to the activism of NRA members. On Wednesday, February 6, the House Agriculture, Livestock, & Natural Resources Committee voted down two bills, House Bill 1137 and House Bill 1096. Finally, House Bill 1190 was withdrawn by its sponsor.

Mandatory Storage Bill Sent to Senate Appropriations Committee On Monday, February 4 the Senate Committee on State, Veterans & Military Affairs voted 3-2 to send Senate Bill 49 to the Senate Appropriations Committee. SB49 requires mandatory storage of all firearms. This legislation would force adults to put all their firearms under lock and key or face an undetermined misdemeanor if that firearm is later used in a suicide or crime. This dangerous bill renders homeowners defenseless and gives criminals a clear advantage in home invasions. Please contact the members of the committee and respectfully urge them to defeat this dangerous legislation. Contact information can be found here.

Why is West after Pakistan’s nukes?

February 3, 2008

source: http://rupeenews.com/2008/02/03/why-is-west-after-pakistan%e2%80%99s-nukes-by-maftab/

You will have to read this entire story to fully understand the obvious hatred that this man has for western society, and the United States in particular. Well Mister Aftab, get a clue:

  1. Those “innocent” Japanese were actively supporting mass killings all across Asia.
  2. We do have people on the ground in Pakistan, and there is the very real possibility of a Tali ban style regime taking over the nation.
  3. Israel exists, get used to it. Hit them with nuclear weapons expect retaliation.
  4. Israel has not threatened anyone with annihilation. Muslim nations have threatened Israel, and the United States with annihilation on many occasions.
  5. What the hell would we, as in the USA, want your countries weapons for? We have plenty of our own.

The Platform of the American People

February 3, 2008

source: http://www.americansolutions.com/media/4CDF1CEC-779C-4699-A123-A8992F4D9219/a7655bbb-c71f-44d4-9743-5ca3e6b0cf37.pdf

This is an interesting study to be sure. How much is practical and easily doable remains to be seen. It is in PDF so you will need a reader. I do agree with a lot that is in there, such as immigration issues. But the parts that give more government money (taxes that you and I pay) are anathema.