A Leopard changing it’s spots? Perhaps…

June 8, 2008

http://awakenlife.net/2008/06/08/the-rebellion-within/#comment-232

Over at Awakenlife they found an excellent story having to do with one of the deadliest people that has been roaming the planet in quite a while.

Last May, a fax arrived at the London office of the Arabic newspaper Asharq Al Awsat from a shadowy figure in the radical Islamist movement who went by many names. Born Sayyid Imam al-Sharif, he was the former leader of the Egyptian terrorist group Al Jihad, and known to those in the underground mainly as Dr. Fadl. Members of Al Jihad became part of the original core of Al Qaeda; among them was Ayman al-Zawahiri, Osama bin Laden’s chief lieutenant. Fadl was one of the first members of Al Qaeda’s top council. Twenty years ago, he wrote two of the most important books in modern Islamist discourse; Al Qaeda used them to indoctrinate recruits and justify killing. Now Fadl was announcing a new book, rejecting Al Qaeda’s violence. “We are prohibited from committing aggression, even if the enemies of Islam do that,” Fadl wrote in his fax, which was sent from Tora Prison, in Egypt.

Fadl’s fax confirmed rumors that imprisoned leaders of Al Jihad were part of a trend in which former terrorists renounced violence. His defection posed a terrible threat to the radical Islamists, because he directly challenged their authority. “There is a form of obedience that is greater than the obedience accorded to any leader, namely, obedience to God and His Messenger,” Fadl wrote, claiming that hundreds of Egyptian jihadists from various factions had endorsed his position.

Two months after Fadl’s fax appeared, Zawahiri issued a handsomely produced video on behalf of Al Qaeda. “Do they now have fax machines in Egyptian jail cells?” he asked. “I wonder if they’re connected to the same line as the electric-shock machines.” This sarcastic dismissal was perhaps intended to dampen anxiety about Fadl’s manifesto—which was to be published serially, in newspapers in Egypt and Kuwait—among Al Qaeda insiders. Fadl’s previous work, after all, had laid the intellectual foundation for Al Qaeda’s murderous acts. On a recent trip to Cairo, I met with Gamal Sultan, an Islamist writer and a publisher there. He said of Fadl, “Nobody can challenge the legitimacy of this person. His writings could have far-reaching effects not only in Egypt but on leaders outside it.” Usama Ayub, a former member of Egypt’s Islamist community, who is now the director of the Islamic Center in Münster, Germany, told me, “A lot of people base their work on Fadl’s writings, so he’s very important. When Dr. Fadl speaks, everyone should listen.”

Although the debate between Fadl and Zawahiri was esoteric and bitterly personal, its ramifications for the West were potentially enormous. Other Islamist organizations had gone through violent phases before deciding that such actions led to a dead end. Was this happening to Al Jihad? Could it happen even to Al Qaeda?

A THEORIST OF JIHAD

The roots of this ideological war within Al Qaeda go back forty years, to 1968, when two precocious teen-agers met at Cairo University’s medical school. Zawahiri, a student there, was then seventeen, but he was already involved in clandestine Islamist activity. Although he was not a natural leader, he had an eye for ambitious, frustrated youths like him who believed that destiny was whispering in their ear.

So it was not surprising that he was drawn to a tall, solitary classmate named Sayyid Imam al-Sharif. Admired for his brilliance and his tenacity, Imam was expected to become either a great surgeon or a leading cleric. (The name “al-Sharif” denotes the family’s descent from the Prophet Muhammad.) His father, a headmaster in Beni Suef, a town seventy-five miles south of Cairo, was conservative, and his son followed suit. He fasted twice a week and, each morning after dawn prayers, studied the Koran, which he had memorized by the time he finished sixth grade. When he was fifteen, the Egyptian government enrolled him in a boarding school for exceptional students, in Cairo. Three years later, he entered medical school, and began preparing for a career as a plastic surgeon, specializing in burn injuries.

Both Zawahiri and Imam were pious and high-minded, prideful, and rigid in their views. They tended to look at matters of the spirit in the same way they regarded the laws of nature—as a series of immutable rules, handed down by God. This mind-set was typical of the engineers and technocrats who disproportionately made up the extremist branch of Salafism, a school of thought intent on returning Islam to the idealized early days of the religion.

Imam learned that Zawahiri belonged to a subterranean world. “I knew from another student that Ayman was part of an Islamic group,” he later told a reporter for Al Hayat, a pan-Arabic newspaper. The group came to be called Al Jihad. Its discussions centered on the idea that real Islam no longer existed, because Egypt’s rulers had turned away from Islamic law, or Sharia, and were steering believers away from salvation and toward secular modernity. The young members of Al Jihad decided that they had to act.

In doing so, these men were placing their lives, and perhaps their families, in terrible jeopardy. Egypt’s military government, then led by Gamal Abdel Nasser, had a vast network of informers and secret police. The prisons were brimming with Islamist detainees, locked away in dungeons where torture was routine. Despite this repressive atmosphere, an increasing number of Egyptians, disillusioned with Nasser’s socialist, secular government, were turning to the mosque for political answers. In 1967, Nasser led Egypt and its Arab allies into a disastrous confrontation with Israel, which crushed the Egyptian Air Force in an afternoon. The Sinai Peninsula soon passed to Israeli control. The Arab world was traumatized, and that deepened the appeal of radical Islamists, who argued that Muslims had fallen out of God’s favor, and that only by returning to the religion as it was originally practiced could Islam regain its supremacy in the world.

http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2008/06/02/080602fa_fact_wright/?yrail

Who can you believe..?

June 8, 2008

Almost thirty years ago word was spreading that there was something terribly wrong going on. There were the five “H’s” and what was killing people..? In the health profession, at least in pre hospital we were all wondering how to protect our selves from this unknown disease. We knew that it could be spread, but was largely confined to homosexual men and intravenous drug users. It was as if the people that were infected had no ability to fight this menace off at all. For all the progress in understanding, and battling AIDS, some things have not changed all that much though.

The head of the World Health Organization’s HIV/AIDS department has officially admitted for the first time that there will be no global epidemic of the disease among the heterosexual population outside Africa, The Independent reported.

Kevin de Cock said global prevention strategies to address AIDS as a risk to all populations, among the WHO and major AIDS organizations, may have been misdirected. It is now recognized that, with the exception of sub-Saharan African, it is confined to high-risk groups.

These groups include men who have sex with other men, drug users who inject with needles, and sex workers and their clients, The Independent reported.

“It is very unlikely there will be a heterosexual epidemic in other countries,” de Cock is quoted in The Independent. “Ten years ago a lot of people were saying there would be a generalized epidemic in Asia — China was the big worry with its huge population. That doesn’t look likely. But we have to be careful. As an epidemiologist it is better to describe what we can measure. There could be small outbreaks in some areas.”

However, AIDS still kills more adults than all wars, and is winning against current efforts to address it, The Independent reported. A WHO/U.N. AIDS report published in June shows less than a third of people in developing countries who need anti-retroviral drugs are receiving them. There were 33 million people living with HIV in 2007.

One result of the WHO’s admission may be that the vast sums of money spent on AIDS education for people who are not at risk may now be concentrated on high-risk groups.

Some AIDS organizations, including the WHO, U.N. AIDS and the Global Fund have been blasted for inflating estimates of the number of people infected, taking much-needed funds from other diseases like malaria, spending it on the wrong efforts such as abstinence programs rather than condoms.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,364345,00.html

The Senate read the bill!

June 6, 2008

“The continued rapid cooling of the earth since WWII is in accord with the increase in global air pollution associated with industrialization, mechanization, urbanization and exploding population.”
—Reid Bryson, “Global Ecology; Readings towards a rational strategy for Man”, (1971)

Well, by gosh, someone listened! Or was it the smell of tar and the sight of all those feather beds being toted by people outside the local offices of the Senators? In any case this is all from Downsize DC.

Something incredible happened last night. The U.S. Senate actually read the so-called “Climate Security Act” and a substitute amendment — out loud, word for word.

500+ pages. 10 hours to read!

This legislation, which would impose a huge tax and regulatory system on all carbon emissions, is about 300 pages long. Congress constantly passes bills this large, or larger, without reading them. If it took 10 hours to read this one bill, just imagine what would happen if they had to read ALL their bills.

The pace of legislation, and the growth of government, would slow down. It might even be possible for a citizen group (like DownsizeDC.org), or a reporter, or a talk-show host, or even just an ordinary citizen, to keep up with all the things Congress is doing.

For the very few people who oppose DownsizeDC.org’s “Read the Bills Act” (in our experience, that’s not even one out of every ten people who hear about it) this would be a bad thing. These people think we need more government, even if it must come at the cost of passing legislation that the members of Congress haven’t read, let alone understood.

We think this is irresponsible. Remember, Congress may not have to read a bill, or really understand it. But YOU will have to bear the burden of obeying every word of it!

In the case of the “cap and trade” bill, U.S. companies will have to hire thousands of lawyers to do their own 100-hour (or more) readings of this legislation (because unlike Congress, they will actually have to understand how to obey it). Compliance will cost billions of dollars. That cost will be passed on to you, the consumer, as will the tax that companies must pay to buy their carbon emission permits.

But it doesn’t end there.

The way the government works today legislation is just the starting point for the creation of rules. Once something like the “cap and trade” bill is passed the federal bureaucracy then goes to work creating specific regulations to execute the legislation.

This means billions more will be spent on more lawyers to read, understand, and comply with these regulations. And you will pay for all of this too. Unelected bureaucrats shouldn’t be able to burden the public with more laws. That’s why we also need to pass the Write the Laws Act.

Some people say it’s unreasonable to expect Congress to read all of its legislation, but . . .

Could YOU get away with violating a law because you felt it was unreasonable for the government to expect you to read, understand, and comply with all their huge legislation and bureaucratic rules?

Of course not. If you must bear the burden (in time and higher prices and worry that you’re not running afoul of some crazy rule) THEN SO SHOULD THE MEMBERS OF CONGRESS!

One Congressman has called the “Read the Bills Act” a gimmick. But the real gimmick was what happened in the Senate last night. The “cap and trade” bill was read out loud NOT so that the members of Congress could know what they were being asked to pass, but because the Republicans wanted to slow things down to make a point about how judicial nominations are being handled by the Democrats.

ALMOST NO SENATORS WERE IN THE ROOM TO HEAR THE BILL BEING READ!

For us, the “Read the Bills Act” is NOT a gimmick. It’s an essential requirement for responsible representative government. For us, the very most important feature of the “Read the Bills Act” is NOT . . .

* The 7-day waiting period before a vote can be held. Yes, it’s a great idea. It gives citizen-action groups time to organize opposition at the moment of highest public interest in a bill. But the “cap and trade” bill will be just as bad if they pass it 7 days from now.
* The requirement that members of Congress sign an affidavit, under penalty of perjury, that they have read a bill. That is also important, but secondary.

Both of these features are valuable and helpful. They make the bill complete. But they are not the true key to bringing about responsible government. Instead, the most important aspect of the “Read the Bills Act” is forcing the members of each chamber of Congress to SIT through and LISTEN to a full reading of each bill before a vote can be held.

This, and only this, can bring about real change in how our government operates, because this is the ONLY feature of the “Read the Bills Act” that compels the politicians to pay a PERSONAL PRICE for the burdens they seek to impose on the American people. This feature, and only this feature, will . . .

* Make sure that most members of Congress have an informed idea of what it is they are passing.
* Make Congress prioritize, instead of simply enacting every wild idea that strikes their collective fancy (and that’s what they do now because they don’t have to pause and read the bill out loud, word for word, on the floor, before voting).
* Make bills shorter, and more understandable, so that Congress can endure the fatigue of hearing them read.

The “Read the Bills Act,” as we have constructed it, would bring about real, meaningful reform. It would go a long way toward protecting us from 300-page monstrosities like the so-called “Climate Security Act.” But . . .

Until the “Read the Bills Act” passes the only protection we have is YOU, and the work you do through DownsizeDC.org. DC Downsizers have bombarded Congress with more than 5,000 messages opposing the “Climate Security Act.” But more is needed. If you haven’t yet sent a message on this issue, please do so now. You can do so here.

Or, if you have sent a message, please send another one in support of the “Read the Bills Act.” Use your personal comments to take note of the 10-hour reading that took place last night. Tell them you oppose the “Climate Security Act,” and support the “Read the Bills Act” as a way to protect the American people against irresponsible legislation. You can send that message here.

Dead on Arrival? S. 2191

June 6, 2008

The “Climate Security Act” is up for a vote in the United States Senate today. My sources tell me that it is all but dead on arrival at the Senate floor, but not quite. This bill, epitomizes the sheer lunacy that has befallen so many in the world. My friend calls people that support things like this “watermelons.” As in green on the outside, and red on the inside. I will continue to refer to them as neo-communist. Unless I have one to many a pint of plain. 😀

The facts in this matter are clear enough for even those legally blind to see. This is what S. 2191 would actually do to you, me, and the generations that follow.

Just what would this abomination do?

  1. Place caps on CO2 emissions.
  2. Sell permits to by-pass those caps.
  3. Create a market so that business’s could trade or sell those permits.
  4. Use the funds generated by the sale of said permits to fund more research that would spread this new religion even more insidiously.

Then those things would have the immediate effect of:

  1. Raising the cost of heating or cooling your home, business, and the schools. Don’t think that the cost gasoline will not be affected, it will, and in a big way.
  2. Give politicos more methods of destroying the free market, advance their crony’s, and eliminate those that refuse to kneel to them.
  3. Create an even bigger boondoggle of research, by researchers that don’t know how to research despite all the fancy letters following their names.

Murphy’s Lessor known laws …

June 5, 2008

From Chris Smith, affectionately known as “Mister Christer” this comes along the internet via email. Enjoy! 😀
Murphy’s Lesser Known Laws

1. Light travels faster than sound. This is why some
people appear bright until you hear them speak.

2. Change is inevitable, except from a vending
machine.

3. Those who live by the sword get shot by those who
don’t.

4. Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented
fool.

5. The 50-50-90 rule: Anytime you have a 50-50 chance
of getting something right, there’s a 90% probability
you’ll get it wrong.

6. If you lined up all the cars in the world end to
end, someone would be stupid enough to try to pass
them, five or six at a time, on a hill, in the fog.

7. The things that come to those who wait will be the
scraggly junk left by those who got there first.

8. The shin bone is a device for finding furniture in
a dark room.

9. A fine is a tax for doing wrong. A tax is a fine
for doing well.

10. When you go into court, you are putting yourself
into the hands of 12 people who weren’t smart enough
to get out of jury duty.

Think about it, he dispatches Flight for Life from the Saint Anthony Communication center!

Then, and this is no joke people; About twenty years ago while out fly fishing I stopped off at a shop on the way to Leadville. Inside, I found a poster, it was simple in nature, and printed in the 1850’s. So, what would so interest me about a poster that was well over a hundred years old? Well … Read on ! 😀

SPERRYS LAW … The good mister Murphy was a damned optimist!

SEMPER FI!

June 5, 2008

Proudly stolen from Texas Fred! 😀 Semper Fi brother!

The Navy Invented Sex….

A Marine and a sailor were sitting in a bar one day arguing over which was the superior service.

After a swig of beer the Marine says, ‘Well, we had Iwo Jima.’

Arching his eyebrows, the sailor replies, ‘We had the Battle of Midway.’

‘Not entirely true’, responded the Marine. ‘Some of those pilots were Marines, in fact, Henderson Field on Guadalcanal was named after a Marine pilot killed at the Battle of Midway.’

The sailor responds, ‘Point taken.’

The Marine then says, ‘We Marines were born at Tunn Tavern!’

The sailor, nodding agreement, says, ‘But we had John Paul Jones.’

The argument continued until the sailor comes up with what he thinks will end the discussion. With a flourish of finality he says…… ‘The Navy invented sex!’

The Marine replies, ‘That is true, but it was the Marines who introduced it to women.’


http://TexasFred.net/

The Darwin Awards are out!

June 4, 2008

Source: Antique guns newsletter

Eighth Place
In Detroit , a 41-year-old man got stuck and drowned in two feet of water after
squeezing head first through an 18-inch-wide sewer grate to retrieve his car
keys.

Seventh Place
A 49-year-old San Francisco stockbroker, who ‘totally zoned when he
ran’, accidentally, jogged off a 100-foot high cliff on his daily run.

Sixth Place
While at the beach, Daniel Jones, 21, dug an 8 foot hole for protection from
the wind and had been sitting in a beach chair at the bottom! When it
collapsed, burying him beneath 5 feet of sand. People on the beach used their
hands and shovels trying to get him out but could not reach him. It took rescue
workers using heavy equipment almost an hour to free him. Jones was pronounced
dead at a hospital.

Fifth Place
Santiago Alvarado, 24, was killed as he fell through the ceiling of a bicycle
shop he was burglarizing. Death was caused when the long flashlight he had
placed in his mouth to keep his hands free rammed into the base of his skull as
he hit the floor.

Fourth Place
Sylvester Briddell, Jr., 26, was killed as he won a bet with friends who said
he would not put a revolver loaded with four bullets into his mouth and pull
the trigger.

Third Place
After stepping around a marked police patrol car parked at the front door, a
man walked into H&J Leather & Firearms intent on robbing the store. The
shop was full of customers and a uniformed officer was standing at the counter.
Upon seeing the officer, the would-be robber announced a hold-up! and fired a
few wild shots from a target pistol. The officer and a clerk promptly returned
fire, and several customers also drew their guns and fired. The robber was
pronounced dead at the scene by Paramedics. Crime scene investigators located
47 expended cartridge cases in the shop. The subsequent autopsy revealed 23
gunshot wounds. Ballistics identified rounds from 7 different weapons. No one
else was hurt.

HONORABLE MENTION
Paul Stiller, 47, and his wife Bonnie were bored just driving around at 2 A.M.
so they lit a quarter stick of dynamite to toss out the window to see what
would happen. Apparently they failed to notice the window was closed.

RUNNER UP
Kerry Bingham had been drinking with several friends when one of them said they
knew a person who had bungee-jumped from a local bridge in the middle of
traffic. The conversation grew more heated and at least 10 men trooped along
the walkway of the bridge at 4:30 AM. Upon arrival at the midpoint of the
bridge they discovered that no one had brought a bungee rope. Bingham, who had
continued drinking, volunteered and pointed out that a coil of lineman’s
cable lay near by. They secured one end around Bingham’s leg and then tied
the other to the bridge. His fall lasted 40 feet before the cable tightened and
tore his foot off at the ankle.. He miraculously survived his fall into the icy
water and was rescued by two nearby fishermen. Bingham’s foot was never
located.

AND THE WINNER IS…
Zookeeper Friedrich Riesfeldt ( Paderborn, Germany ) fed his constipated
elephant 22 doses of animal laxative and more than a bushel of berries, figs
and prunes before the plugged-up pachyderm finally got relief.
Investigators say ill-fated Friedrich, 46, was attempting to give the ailing
elephant an olive oil enema when the relieved beast unloaded.
The sheer force of the elephant’s unexpected defecation knocked Mr.
Riesfeldt to the ground where he struck his head on a rock as the elephant
continued to evacuate 200 pounds of dung on top of him.

Give peace a chance; Robin Williams

June 4, 2008

Got this from the g/f’s father, enjoy! 😀The Plan! ?

Robin Williams, wearing a shirt that says “I love New York ”
in Arabic.

You gotta love Robin Williams……Even if he’s nuts! Leave it to Robin Williams to come up with the perfectplan. What we need now is for our UN Ambassador to stand up and repeat this message.
Robin Williams’ plan...(Hard to argue with this logic!)

“I see a lot of people yelling for peace but I have not heard of a plan for peace. So, here’s one plan.”

1)
“The US will apologize to the world for our “interference” in their affairs, past & present. You know, Hitler, Mussolini, Stalin, Tojo, Noriega, Milosevic, Hussein, and the rest of those “good ‘ ole’ boys”, we will never “interfere” again.

2) We will withdraw our troops from all over the world, starting with Germany , South Korea , the Middle East, and the Philippines They don’t want us there. We would station troops at our borders. No one allowed sneaking through holes in the fence.

3) All illegal aliens have 90 days to get their affairs together and leave . We’ll give them a free trip home. After 90 days the remainder will be gathered up and deported immediately, regardless of whom or where they are. They’re illegal!!! France will welcome them.

4) All future visitors will be thoroughly checked and limited to 90 days unless given a special permit!!!! No one from a terrorist nation will be allowed in. If you don’t like it there, change it yourself and don’t hide here. Asylum would never be available to anyone. We don’t need any more cab drivers or 7-11 cashiers.

5) No foreign “students” over age 21. The older ones are the bombers. If they don’t attend classes, they get a “D” and it’s back home baby.

6) The US will make a strong effort to become self-sufficient energy wise. This will include developing
nonpolluting sources of energy but will require a temporary drilling of oil in the Alaskan wilderness. The caribou will have to cope for awhile
.

7) Offer Saudi Arabia and other oil producing countries $10 a barrel for their oil. If they don’t like it, we go someplace else. They can go somewhere else to sell their production. (About a week of the wells filling up the storage sites would be enough.)

8) If there is a famine or other natural catastrophe in the world, we will not
“interfere.” They can pray to Allah or whomever, for seeds, rain, cement or whatever they need. Besides most of what we give them is stolen or given to the army. The people who need it most get very little, if anything.

9) Ship the UN Headquarters to an isolated island someplace. We don’t need the spies and fair weather friends here. Besides, the building would make a good homeless shelter or lockup for illegal aliens.

10) All Americans must go to charm and
beauty school. That way, no one can call us “Ugly Americans”
any longer. The Language we speak is ENGLISH..learn it…or
LEAVE…Now, isn’t that a winner of a plan?

“The Statue of Liberty is no longer saying “Give me your tired, your poor, your
huddled masses.” She’s got a baseball bat and she’s yelling, ‘you want a piece of me?’ ”

.

This is the end, my only friend, the end …

June 4, 2008

Well, I guess the party is over. It’s been rather fun watching Hillary and Obama rip each other seemingly on a daily basis. Just how much can be attributed to “Operation Chaos?” I personally believe that Rush Limbaugh had little to do with it. All the internal strife within the Democrat party that is.

This was, I believe, more about the Clinton Machine being defeated than anything else. The Clinton’s are, and were appeasers. The Democrat Party, after all has been taken over by those that are on the extreme far left of the political spectrum, and they are not the types that are willing to compromise.

Big government authoritarianism is raising it’s ugly head here in America. It matters not whether it is from the right or the left of the political spectrum. If you are an individual then you had better watch out. You are about to become one with the “Borg,” to borrow some Star Trek terminology. Atlas Shrugged indeed! But, it took a few years past 1984, in order for George Orwell’s prescience to become a very real possibility.

I call it metastatic communism, because, like a virulent cancer it spreads, and destroys that which feeds it. First it was social welfare issues that were meant to be last ditch attempts at saving people from themselves, that is, from failure. The best example that I can think of here in America would be the Social Security program. Soon, it will be basic private property rights, after all, the benefit of the many far outweighs your own needs. Just because you earned that gadget means nothing. Be sure that you never question any of this, for, after all, should you do so you will be deemed mentally incompetent, if not a dangerous subversive as well. yes, then there is that little “dangerous” clause to all this righteous indignation that the elitist’s with authoritarian ideology worry about. Any danger to them ( The elitist’s.) is a danger to all, after all is said and done. What to do about that..? Simple! Disarm any that hold different beliefs. That will pave the way to the utopia that is to be our future!

That, will be the methodology of the Neo-Communist. That, is democracy, and why a Constitutional republic, is so superior.

Free People, Free markets

June 3, 2008

This is interesting to say the least. I2I is putting on a series of classes that will put the shame to anything offered at Colorado State University in Boulder, at least that is currently being offered.

It is also a shameless plug for the Independence Institute. They seem to be the only ones that still have brains, and use them for the betterment of all Coloradans.

By now we’re all privy to CU’s consideration with getting a visiting chair in conservative thought and policy in order to cultivate some intellectual diversity on campus. Or at the very least, have one highly paid target to throw pies at. It has been covered in the Rocky, the Post, the Associated Press, and even in a NY Times opinion piece. Ostensibly the position would be rotating, and would feature high profile conservatives with strong ideological backbones. For example, names like Bill Kristol, George Will, and Condi Rice have been kicked around. For the record, I’m still waiting to be asked. Anyway, in the meantime I wish there was some outlet, some class that embodied the type of conservative, free-market perspective CU is going for….

….. ohhhhhhhhhhhhhh, that’s right! Our Free People, Free Markets class! A class that features so much “intellectual diversity,” it has a disclaimer that reads, “if you live, or have lived in Boulder, please be aware. What you hear in the classroom might induce a conniption fit or make your head explode.”

For those thinking of attending, don’t think, just do it. It will change your life. The class will take place for five consecutive Saturdays here at the Institute, from 9am to noon, beginning July 12th and going to August 9th. You can reserve your spot by either calling Kay at 303.279.6536 or emailing rsvp@i2i.org.